PDA

View Full Version : A couple of updated pics...



Workhorse
05-27-2003, 09:41 AM
A couple of updated pics.... they are already in my journal... but I thought I'd post them here also.

Here's a back double bi....
Back Double Bi (http://www.wannabebigforums.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=516363)

Workhorse
05-27-2003, 09:41 AM
A front single bi.... (a little blurry)...
Front Single Bi (http://www.wannabebigforums.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=516364)

Workhorse
05-27-2003, 09:41 AM
Wheels....
Wheels (http://www.wannabebigforums.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=516367)

Workhorse
05-27-2003, 09:42 AM
*awaits moderator approval.... :D

BCC
05-27-2003, 09:56 AM
Looking good (I checked out the pictures in your journal.) Also, I agree with you, no need to start cutting, while your midsection may not be defined, it's still slim with little to no signs of fat accumulation. Which also tells me you've been dieting well.

All in all, you look like you're doing real well, I say give 230 hell :thumbup:

Workhorse
05-27-2003, 10:04 AM
Chase, thanks man. I really appreciate it... I was just about to go and post in your journal!! I figure if I'm trying to get big... cutting won't help me right now... go figure, eh? lol

Mik
05-27-2003, 10:59 AM
I saw the pics in your journal Stu. Looking solid man. I agree, you don't look as though your bf is too high so go for the bulk. Your back is really lookin' ace! I can't wait to start bulking again.

Workhorse
05-27-2003, 11:07 AM
Thanks Mik.

Why haven't the pics been approved yet??? :confused: :scratch:

Ironman8
05-27-2003, 07:22 PM
Looking awesome dude!

kook
05-27-2003, 07:27 PM
you look great, back double bi looks real good, and screw cuttin when you look like that

quads are great, but the upper legs overpower your calves, probably looks diff in person but the calves do look kinda small

BUFF STUFF
05-27-2003, 07:34 PM
Lookin good but your arms dont look 17.5 to me

Is that flexed or cold mesurments ?

BUFF STUFF
05-27-2003, 07:51 PM
Originally posted by Workhorse
A couple of updated pics.... they are already in my journal... but I thought I'd post them here also.

Here's a back double bi....
Back Double Bi (http://www.wannabebigforums.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=516363)


These are 16+

http://www.wannabebigforums.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=523733

GhettoSmurf
05-27-2003, 08:06 PM
looking good workhorse!

Skillz
05-27-2003, 09:11 PM
lookin real good man! i'd say quads are definately a strong point...calves are a weak point,keep tearin those up...same with the traps, but ur doin good, keep it up!
Skillz

Workhorse
05-28-2003, 08:24 AM
My calves have always been small... I'm working on it... I just moved them to my shoulder day to allow for a better workout.

And yes, they are 17.5, cold but flexed. I have thick tri's... its kind of decieveing.

Thanks for all the comments guys... I truely appreciate it.

Anyone else out there have any comments??

Black_Curtain
05-28-2003, 08:46 AM
I think that back is a weak point, lats are OK (could be wider though) but the lower back and rhemboids (SPELLING) could use a helluva lot more detail (Even though details might come only in lower bodyfat and you tend to store more fat in your back). Evening out the TRI\BI ratio can be a good idea too.

Else than that you GOOD - thick and proportioned.

Workhorse
05-28-2003, 08:54 AM
Thanks - I feel my lats are failry good actually, they are hard to show in the back double bi... but in the front single bi, you can see them failry well. Thanks for the advice.

Workhorse
05-30-2003, 09:08 AM
bump... for any more comments....

Rock
05-30-2003, 11:50 AM
looking good overall, just keep doing what your doing, and you are also managing to stay quite lean!

chris mason
05-30-2003, 07:07 PM
You compliment whore you!

Lol, anyway, I think your traps look great. Definition in a weight trainee is solely bodyfat, so to critique your back on definition is silly as that has little to do with development. Of course, if you were competing that would be different.

Your overall rear double bicep looks great.

Now, do you want constructive critcism or no?

Workhorse
06-01-2003, 01:08 PM
CM, you know I can handle whatever you have to say.... but like you said.... "constructive critcism" is better than just "critcism".

Praetorian
06-01-2003, 04:11 PM
and the difference might be......?

bigmean38
06-01-2003, 09:18 PM
lookin big man

Workhorse
06-02-2003, 07:47 AM
Originally posted by Centaurion
and the difference might be......?
Constructive means that its done tactfully and that I'd benefit from it by learning what needs to be improved... normal criticsm would be that I'd just get pissed off and tell everyone to go f**k them selves... lol

Workhorse
06-02-2003, 07:47 AM
thanks bigmean38 :)

Praetorian
06-02-2003, 03:13 PM
aaah. :)

you look good, nice wheels but your calves needs some work!!