Superman vs. Batman

[Jeebus]

This is totally irrelavent to anything mentioned ever before, but my friends and I have argued this for the past five years. I don't know how, but at least once every two or three months it comes up and fuels a heated debate.

Who would win in a fight? Superman or Batman?

Now I know that the obvious answer is Superman (and I have argued for this cat since the argument began), but the other folks that pick Batman say how he has such a huge advantage since he is a genius. They then proceed to point out that since Batman is so smart, he would weave kryptonite into his suit, maybe he would block out the sun, maybe he would fight in a cave after many days, ect. ect.

What is your take on this pointless argument?

[Manveet]

Batman.

[p_t]

Superman. He can just reverse time until he wins.

[Jeebus]

Originally posted by Manveet
Batman.

I need more than a name ;). It doesnt explain why Batman would win.

P.S. He wouldnt

[Manveet]

Why not. If Batman is the world's smartest human being and all?

[GonePostal]

Read the comics it was a tie.

[Mystic Eric]

I'm the comic book geek so I'll give it a go:

Superman entrusted to Batman, Lex Luthor's Kryptonite ring just incase Superman ever goes rogue due to mind control etc. So Batman had that advantage.

If Batman set out a plan or a trap for clark, then it would be more fair game, but if it was a spur of the moment fight, Bruce has no chance.

Thing is, Superman is nearly the speed of light so it would be hard for Batman to touch him but in the comics, supes doesn't usually use his speed to his advantage in fights.

Batman IS genius yes, but Clark is right up there. His brain operates like a computer and is as fast as he is.

There are also things to consider like Superman can just fire heat vision blasts from the atmosphere etc.

Oh, and Superman can't turn back time, he's not as fast as the speed of light.

So when it comes down to it, it really depends on the writer but even though Bats has the ring and is a genius, I dunno if that would be enough to overpower the sheer power of supes.

[Manveet]

like you said eric, if it's a straight up tilt, Superman will win. But if the fight allows them to set up plans etc... Batman would win.

[p_t]

Originally posted by Mystic Eric
I'm the comic book geek so I'll give it a go:


Oh, and Superman can't turn back time, he's not as fast as the speed of light.

[p_t]

Originally posted by Mystic Eric
I'm the comic book geek so I'll give it a go:


Oh, and Superman can't turn back time, he's not as fast as the speed of light.



One of the movies (I can't think of it right now) he flew around the world so fast it started turning the other way to save Lane.

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by p_t


One of the movies (I can't think of it right now) he flew around the world so fast it started turning the other way to save Lane.

Well you gotta remeber that those movies aren't exactly true to character in some (or even a lot of) aspects. Superman currently can't turn back time.

[Budiak]

Batman would win because he's an upper-class white male.

Didnt you learn anything in school?

[JHolmes145]

in the comic book "the dark knight returns" batman whoops on superman when green arrow shoots him w/ a kryptonite arrow

[AdamGberg]

let's stop beating around the bush,the real question is, who would win a fight...George W. or Clinton?

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by JHolmes145
in the comic book "the dark knight returns" batman whoops on superman when green arrow shoots him w/ a kryptonite arrow

That was done by Frank Miller right? I believe in that series, Supes was made out to be a huge idiot tuttut :cry:

[Rastaman]

Superman would beat the hell out of Batman unless Bats could use kryptonite to his advantage.

[ftotti10]

Anybody remember the old batman series on TV. I saw it recently after about five years of not seeing it. It is the funniest show of all time.
One episode with Mr Freeze, had batman and robin trapped in this ice thing. But it wouldn't affect them becuase they were wearing their special bat thermal underpants.


Classic stuff

[Budiak]

You have TV Land I take it?

Ahem.


Penguin: How can this be? I gassed you!

Batman: Luckily we had the foresight to take out anti-penguin gas pills!

SMACK!

POW!


PFFFFFBBRTTT!!!








Ahh, the classics.



Superman would win.




OH! Eric, I'm terribly ashamed of you. You do realize that Superman DID reverse time, right? Superman FOUR I believe? He spun the earth backwards! Earth spin backwards, time move backwards...THEREFORE- precedent set. Its not up for argument.

[Sinep]

The answer is Superman. Just look at all the God like power superman has in comparison to Batman.

[SoulOfKoRea]

Superman, because he's an alien.

[Relentless]

Originally posted by JHolmes145
in the comic book "the dark knight returns" batman whoops on superman when green arrow shoots him w/ a kryptonite arrow

Yeah, that was a Frank Miller graphic novel . . .

I rather liked that one, the art was kinda neat and the story was accessible.

I think part of the confusion/issues around who's tougher arises from the different iterations/versions of superman and batman.

In various incarnations since the Golden Age of comix, both heroes have waxed and waned in apparent power levels, sometimes explained and sometimes not. I'm not enough of comic geek to detail all of the differences for you here, but I think my generalization stands.

IMHO, with adequate prep time and planning, Batman would have the slight edge; he is basically assumed to have near-infinite resources. Coupling that with his intimate knowledge of Supes, and I betcha a combination of magic, kryptonite, and good planning would be enough to break the Man of Steel.

[Jeebus]

Originally posted by AdamGberg
let's stop beating around the bush,the real question is, who would win a fight...George W. or Clinton?

Cretien. He'd wait for the president and ex pres to wear each other out, then pummel them with beavers.

Canada will rule the world:rolleyes:

[drew]

We all know the only real fight is hand to hand, no tricks, no weapons. If two guys get into a fight and one pulls a knife and the other shoots him, it doesn't mean he's the better fighter.

That said, Bruce is nothing without his toys. The son of Jor-El would whoop him good.

[Jeebus]

Thank you drew. It's what its all about. Superman would win 9.9 chances out of 10.

Screw you batman!@()&

[Sinep]

There is a poll on CNN about who would win between The Terminator and The Hulk. Remember people, they are just movies. :)

[Relentless]

Originally posted by drew
We all know the only real fight is hand to hand, no tricks, no weapons. If two guys get into a fight and one pulls a knife and the other shoots him, it doesn't mean he's the better fighter.

That said, Bruce is nothing without his toys. The son of Jor-El would whoop him good.

With all due respect drew & jeebus, and given that this is a discussion about COMIC BOOK HEROES, that's really, really silly.

Batman without gadgets = Not a Superhero.

That's like saying Iron Man can't use his suit in a 'fair' fight or that Green Lantern isn't allowed to use his ring.

the only context in which your "real fight" even makes any sense would be if Superman was stripped of his Superness too... perhaps if the fight was held on a planet with a red sun.

And in that case, I still say, Advantage: Batman -- he hasn't had to rely on super-strength. He is a maximally trained 'normal' human. He has more martial arts training and experience. Superman without his strength would be a buff guy with some moves but he'd get owned.

[drew]

But Superman is Superman with no gadgets. He doesn't need a ring, or a suit, or anything else. He was born that way. Similarly, Spiderman could also kick Wayne's butt, but he wouldn't be allowed to use his lab-made web-shooters. He wasn't born that way, but that's the way he is. (Ditto for all of the X-men characters, but I think Wolverine couldn't use his claws. Not sure)

[Tryska]

it really worries me that a couple of you refer to them as "Supes" and "Bats".

[Jeebus]

Lol. my innocent question turned into a fists off "comic knowledge" battle

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by Tryska
it really worries me that a couple of you refer to them as "Supes" and "Bats".

Why?

[Tryska]

you save nicknames for your friends..not for comic book characters.

[Jeebus]

hahaha

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by Tryska
you save nicknames for your friends..not for comic book characters.

What's wrong with comic book characters? It's not some "childish" thing. Infact, the plot and character development are very indepth.

If you don't believe me, perhaps you should pick up the latest Batman, storyline titled "Hush".

[Tryska]

okay...i wasn't questioning the coolness of comic book xharacters eric..i'm questioning the coolness of having nicknames for comic book characters. ;)

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by Tryska
okay...i wasn't questioning the coolness of comic book xharacters eric..i'm questioning the coolness of having nicknames for comic book characters. ;)

:hide:

[Jeebus]

Ya, but i think she means its coming off like you see the characters as real people when you dictate nicknames for them. Maybe the nicknames are just a thing about trying to type quicker. I dunno.

[Tryska]

*lol* it's okay. you allowed to be dorky from time to time. you'll never acheive LPs level of dorkiness, but i don't necessarily know that that's a good thing to aspire to.

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by Jeebus
Ya, but i think she means its coming off like you see the characters as real people when you dictate nicknames for them. Maybe the nicknames are just a thing about trying to type quicker. I dunno.

Well Supes is just short for Superman so it makes sense. It's not like I gave him some other nickname like "pookie" or something.

[Jeebus]

lol. I wish you had

[Tryska]

baha! i liek pookie.

[Manveet]

Originally posted by Callahan


With all due respect drew & jeebus, and given that this is a discussion about COMIC BOOK HEROES, that's really, really silly.

Batman without gadgets = Not a Superhero.

That's like saying Iron Man can't use his suit in a 'fair' fight or that Green Lantern isn't allowed to use his ring.

the only context in which your "real fight" even makes any sense would be if Superman was stripped of his Superness too... perhaps if the fight was held on a planet with a red sun.

And in that case, I still say, Advantage: Batman -- he hasn't had to rely on super-strength. He is a maximally trained 'normal' human. He has more martial arts training and experience. Superman without his strength would be a buff guy with some moves but he'd get owned.

Batman is a genius though Cal. Although Superman is smart, Batman is smarter. You don't think Batman can out smart Superman?

[Jeebus]

But superman can just eyeball lazer batman.

[drew]

Snoochie Boochies?

[captain piddles]

Supes has cell-tech

cant touch dat

[p_t]

Rules all. http://community.webshots.com/sym/image3/7/94/87/27579487mrryqajFek_ph.jpg

[p_t]

Last one didn't work lets try again.


Rules All

[Ti1301]

theoritically a slower spinning earth would have a different passage of time.
so if you could reverse the rotation you would reverse time itself.
This is theoetical, I don't beleive it is mathmatically theoretical.
so I think it was all idea and not mathimacally supported.
but serisously IF supes could reverse the rotation of the earth too much crap would happen, gravity would be affected adn things would start flying.
reversing the rotation is bull crap.
Time would not reverse.

[p_t]

Time would reverse in theory, events wouldn't.

[JohnCollins]

Originally posted by Tryska
you save nicknames for your friends..not for comic book characters.

This from someone who admits to having tried "...quite a few..." of the Office Dares in another post? Methinks people who live in glass houses should dress in the basement. . .or something. ;)

[captain piddles]

proof that soups is da man

[bob2624]

Here is a question I have always wondered...

Superman has near infinite strength whenever kryptonite is not present and he is on earth. During his lifetime, he has lifted things from skyscrapers, trains, trucks, planes, etc...

Since he was a boy, he has been growing in size. He started out as a kid looking puny and now he is massive. Thus, he achieves muscular hypertropy.

When kryptonite is present, he becomes weak, so weak that he cannot even stand up.

Wouldn't he still be stronger than the average human being even when kryptonite was present? Think of all the tension his muscles have been under.

They HAVE been under stress. We know this because they have grown throughout his life time. How can you explain this?

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by bob2624
Here is a question I have always wondered...

Superman has near infinite strength whenever kryptonite is not present and he is on earth. During his lifetime, he has lifted things from skyscrapers, trains, trucks, planes, etc...

Since he was a boy, he has been growing in size. He started out as a kid looking puny and now he is massive. Thus, he achieves muscular hypertropy.

When kryptonite is present, he becomes weak, so weak that he cannot even stand up.

Wouldn't he still be stronger than the average human being even when kryptonite was present? Think of all the tension his muscles have been under.

They HAVE been under stress. We know this because they have grown throughout his life time. How can you explain this?

He has also moved a planet before/during the WOIW series I believe.

The reason he is so weak when he is around kryptonite is because it's poison to his body. Each of his cells are like a nuclear generator which processes the yellow sun's rays. The kryptonite quickly drains all the processed energy and poisons him.

Think of it as a really strong body builder but then you inject a lethal poison in his blood stream... I betcha he won't even be able to lift a 5 lb DB if that happens.

[Wu36]

Originally posted by Tryska
you save nicknames for your friends..not for comic book characters.
lol

[p_t]

Yea. Just like anything your body has to adapt. In his own planet he was normal because of certain restrictions. He came to earth and has been unrepressed. Those things are suddenly introduced to his system it will act like a forieng substance.

[Tryska]

Originally posted by JohnCollins


This from someone who admits to having tried "...quite a few..." of the Office Dares in another post? Methinks people who live in glass houses should dress in the basement. . .or something. ;)

hey now - it's not like i tried them to amuse myself. it's just stuff that happens.

[PeterParker]

spiderman would beat them both, hahahahahahahahaha

[Jeebus]

I was just roaming the internet in my perpetual boredom, and stumbled across something that reminded me instantly of this argument.

It appears they are making a Batman vs. Superman movie. Anyone interested in reading about it can check it out at http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808417349

This is just hilarious. We will finally see (outside of comics for those of us who don't read them anymore) who will woop who.

My money is on the fact that no one will win and that they will team up for some odd reason.

[Relentless]

Originally posted by Manveet


Batman is a genius though Cal. Although Superman is smart, Batman is smarter. You don't think Batman can out smart Superman?

That's not what I said.
Reread my previous post and the answer should be plain.

[Ti1301]

Time would reverse in theory, events wouldn't.
Theory is nice, but the math is better.
=)

[Ironman8]

I vote Superman. Batman is just some dude in a costume.

[Manveet]

Originally posted by Callahan


With all due respect drew & jeebus, and given that this is a discussion about COMIC BOOK HEROES, that's really, really silly.

Batman without gadgets = Not a Superhero.

That's like saying Iron Man can't use his suit in a 'fair' fight or that Green Lantern isn't allowed to use his ring.

the only context in which your "real fight" even makes any sense would be if Superman was stripped of his Superness too... perhaps if the fight was held on a planet with a red sun.

And in that case, I still say, Advantage: Batman -- he hasn't had to rely on super-strength. He is a maximally trained 'normal' human. He has more martial arts training and experience. Superman without his strength would be a buff guy with some moves but he'd get owned.

This is the post?

your saying batman would win, if Superman's powers were stripped. The context of your scenario is a face to face battle.

I was trying to say that batman can win even if Superman had his powers. However, the context of this fight would not be face to face as in your statement.

[Relentless]

Originally posted by Manveet


This is the post?

your saying batman would win, if Superman's powers were stripped. The context of your scenario is a face to face battle.

I was trying to say that batman can win even if Superman had his powers. However, the context of this fight would not be face to face as in your statement.

Right, however my post was in response to others who stated that the only 'fair' fight would be to duke it out man-to-man with no tricks/gadgets/etc.

I agree with you, by the way. I think Batman would be the victor if BOTH were stripped of powers/gadgets or if they both had all of them. However, the notion of Batman being required to fight Superman sans gadgets and preparation, without Superman likewise being divested of that which makes him 'super', is just stupid.

[Manveet]

Originally posted by Callahan


Right, however my post was in response to others who stated that the only 'fair' fight would be to duke it out man-to-man with no tricks/gadgets/etc.

I agree with you, by the way. I think Batman would be the victor if BOTH were stripped of powers/gadgets or if they both had all of them. However, the notion of Batman being required to fight Superman sans gadgets and preparation, without Superman likewise being divested of that which makes him 'super', is just stupid.

bah, I didn't read the other posts. But agree with what you are saying in regards to a "fair" fight. It would only be fair if both were indeed stripped of their "powers"

[Ti1301]

The Hulk would waltz right in there and kick the krud out of the both of them.

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by Ti1301
The Hulk would waltz right in there and kick the krud out of the both of them.

Hulk could maybe beat Batman but even that's doubtful 'cause Batman would be able to plan his way into beating the Hulk.

But Hulk beating Superman? You're joking right?

1. A nuclear blast will kill the hulk as he can only take blasts from regular missiles. Superman, on the other hand, has an energy aura around him and he can take nuclear blasts with ease.

2. The hulk's strength is around 100,000 tonnes. It can increase when he gets madder but it's never been much higher than that. Superman has no limit to his strength. He has moved planets.

3. Superman is nearly as fast as the speed of light. Hulk is not even as close to that.

4. Superman's heat vision is 10x hotter than the sun. Hulk would not be able to "waltz" right in and take a blast like that.

5. Regular hulk is stupid as hell and would clearly get outsmarted by superman.

[McBain]

can superman walk into a book eric?

[kAiXuan]

Originally posted by p_t


One of the movies (I can't think of it right now) he flew around the world so fast it started turning the other way to save Lane.

movies suck, read the comic

[Manveet]

Originally posted by Mystic Eric


Hulk could maybe beat Batman but even that's doubtful 'cause Batman would be able to plan his way into beating the Hulk.

But Hulk beating Superman? You're joking right?

1. A nuclear blast will kill the hulk as he can only take blasts from regular missiles. Superman, on the other hand, has an energy aura around him and he can take nuclear blasts with ease.

2. The hulk's strength is around 100,000 tonnes. It can increase when he gets madder but it's never been much higher than that. Superman has no limit to his strength. He has moved planets.

3. Superman is nearly as fast as the speed of light. Hulk is not even as close to that.

4. Superman's heat vision is 10x hotter than the sun. Hulk
would not be able to "waltz" right in and take a blast like that.

5. Regular hulk is stupid as hell and would clearly get outsmarted by superman.

nerd!

[Ti1301]

No the hulk does not have any extra powers.
The Hulk does get stronger as he gets madder and fights on.

5. Regular hulk is stupid as hell and would clearly get outsmarted by superman.
Remember Brainiac?
Hulks SUPER GENIUS enemy.
When it comes to the hulk it's brawn over brains.
And it won't be maybe on batman, he would make paste out of him quick.
How many times have I seen Batman knocked unconcious by a super strong enemy with powers.
Way to many times.
As we have all seen as the fight drags on supes gets REAL tired, but the hulk won't.
In many fights if you think about it, Supes can use his super speed to fight, but he doesn't so maybe he isn't so smart.Supes and a nuclear blast, now that is fun and all, but too bad he won't be shooting one at the hulk.
heat vision, hulk can dodge it and whack him in the face.
:D
Oh and moving the planet, that is BS.
If you think about it he would actually end up puhing a hole through the earth if he tried to move it physically.
There would be no substance to push off against strong enough to withstand the pressure exerted.
It would be like pushing a mack truck with your hands with a styrafoam block in between the block would break under the force.

[ZeroBurn]

ok i'll bite. i used to be into comics as a kid and have kept an ear out ever since though i'm not as intimately involved as i used to be.

how is this even a debate. Batman would rip through Superman in a single bound.

first off, you need to take into account batman's preparation. this is key, it's one of his greatest assets, and is in line with his physical abilities and gadgets and training. he's ALWAYS prepared, so saying "given adaquete time..." is just a given. stirpping batman's preparation time is like stripping away his resources.

next, take into account their personalities. it's not what they're ABLE to do, it's what they're WILLING to do. superman's too much of a boyscout, he's the good guy. batman's heart is considerably darker and will do anything to win the fight. superman COULD swoop down from the sky and blast batman's puny skeleton apart, but he never would. this has been played out several times.

and then of course there's the sake of precendence. in every relevant superman vs. batman encounter i can recall, batman's always been hands down the asskicker. Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns- Batman shows exemplory care in planning out the battle, manipulating every angle of clark's personality. My favorite quote was something like "In all your years to come... This moment... I want you to remember Clark... My hands... and your throat... the man.. who BEAT you." in Tower of Babel, Batman's secret files on how to take superman down are stolen, and used. Superman's taken down in a heartbeat- by HENCHMEN. in that picture whoever posted, it was the cover of one of the new batman issues i believe- but that picture never even happened in the comic. batman once again whooped superman's ass, using his intimate knowledge of what he would do, with aid from the kryptonite ring.

so while i agree superman COULD beat batman, he never would. the guy's just too plain nice. it's like sticking a cold blooded murderer up against a cop w/ equal skill. the murderer would take out the cop without hesistation, the cop would be all goody goody and be like ohhh i don't kill, i'd be as bad as him.

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by ZeroBurn
ok i'll bite. i used to be into comics as a kid and have kept an ear out ever since though i'm not as intimately involved as i used to be.

how is this even a debate. Batman would rip through Superman in a single bound.

first off, you need to take into account batman's preparation. this is key, it's one of his greatest assets, and is in line with his physical abilities and gadgets and training. he's ALWAYS prepared, so saying "given adaquete time..." is just a given. stirpping batman's preparation time is like stripping away his resources.

next, take into account their personalities. it's not what they're ABLE to do, it's what they're WILLING to do. superman's too much of a boyscout, he's the good guy. batman's heart is considerably darker and will do anything to win the fight. superman COULD swoop down from the sky and blast batman's puny skeleton apart, but he never would. this has been played out several times.

and then of course there's the sake of precendence. in every relevant superman vs. batman encounter i can recall, batman's always been hands down the asskicker. Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns- Batman shows exemplory care in planning out the battle, manipulating every angle of clark's personality. My favorite quote was something like "In all your years to come... This moment... I want you to remember Clark... My hands... and your throat... the man.. who BEAT you." in Tower of Babel, Batman's secret files on how to take superman down are stolen, and used. Superman's taken down in a heartbeat- by HENCHMEN. in that picture whoever posted, it was the cover of one of the new batman issues i believe- but that picture never even happened in the comic. batman once again whooped superman's ass, using his intimate knowledge of what he would do, with aid from the kryptonite ring.

so while i agree superman COULD beat batman, he never would. the guy's just too plain nice. it's like sticking a cold blooded murderer up against a cop w/ equal skill. the murderer would take out the cop without hesistation, the cop would be all goody goody and be like ohhh i don't kill, i'd be as bad as him.

Hey, if you used to be into comics, check out the new Superman Birthright written by Mark Waid. It's kinda the beginnings of Superman and it starts off in Africa when he goes travelling after he's done school. Some good stuff.

As well, look into superman red son by Mark Millar - a 3 part series.

Btw, thing is though, Frank Miller never liked superman and wrote him out to be a wimp in Dark Knight Returns. It's funny you mentioned that line he said 'cause I was reading the exact same one in chapters today in the compilation book of the entire series.

[Brawl]

I know all ... Superman would . I like Batman way more but Superman could blast him with heat vision or fly at supersonic speed and run into him .


Thanos or Superman? TheGladiator or Superman?

[Sayiajin Prince]

thanos vs darksied thats what i wanna see

[Sayiajin Prince]

hulk vs superman?? this has been decided in the marvel vs DC crossover comic book

hulk ate supermans heatvision like candy but supes won

hulk is the strongest being ever this is a fact! galactus isnt as strong as the hulk neither is thanos.

hulk is stronger than superman but superman has more resistance (way more which is why he won)

its not that surprizing b/c iron man has beaten the hulk and even spiderman has beaten him.

[SupermanII]

I would win damn it.

[Mystic Eric]

Originally posted by Sayiajin Prince
hulk vs superman?? this has been decided in the marvel vs DC crossover comic book

hulk ate supermans heatvision like candy but supes won

hulk is the strongest being ever this is a fact! galactus isnt as strong as the hulk neither is thanos.

hulk is stronger than superman but superman has more resistance (way more which is why he won)

its not that surprizing b/c iron man has beaten the hulk and even spiderman has beaten him.

Bah! Those cross over type things shouldn't really count. I mean come on, ate his heat vision like candy? Superman's heat vision is about 10x hotter than the sun. Hulk's skin is tough I know, but throw him into the sun and he's toast.

[Maki Riddington]

OMG Eric, seriously listen to yourself.

[Gyno Rhino]

*laugh* Listen to all y'all. DAYUM.

[McBain]

:dj:

'he can walk into any book
with his pony pal pokie too'

http://www.carleton.ca/duc/tic/twac/98/oct8/gumby.jpg


GUMBY!

[Sayiajin Prince]

comon eric, people wanted to know who would win, so they madea comic book specifically to answer that question, 'nuff said

oh mcbain is correct: gumby would kick all of their asses!

[gino]

OK, Gumby vs Spongebob Squarepants

discuss

[Jeebus]

Spongebob would annoy the hell out of Gumby with his insessant laughter, followed by Gumby blowing his brains out with a shotgun.

ROCK ON SPONGEBOB!!

[Gyno Rhino]

Spongebob, hands down. Spongebob is king.

Gumby can be contorted any which way, but subject his clay body to compression... And he's out.

Spongebob on the other hand, is open to tension force. A weakness which Gumby also shares.

So Spongebob comes out on top. But I think Pokey could beat the crap out of Patrick.

[Jeebus]

Originally posted by Gyno Rhino
Gumby can be contorted any which way, but subject his clay body to compression... And he's out.

So he's technically the ultimate lover for woman?

[Gyno Rhino]

Well, I'm number one. But he's a close two.

[Jeebus]

You and Gumby need to fight to figure out once and for all, who is in fact number one.

2000 woman, 20 days. Who will last?

My 25$ are on Gumby.

[Gyno Rhino]

Ahhh.. But Gumby still has a colon (assuming he has organs at all). Having one will slow you down.

No colon = great sex

[Jeebus]

I don't think Gumby does have a colon. But then again, he probably doesn't have a wanger. But he can just stretch his wierd gumby skin into a fancy thing to pleasure all women

[McBain]

i dont think gumby has a johnson tuttut

[Jeebus]

But if he did. Watch out ladies.