View Full Version : First pictures ever
AnabolicJake
05-10-2004, 09:40 AM
i have been training for about 10 months, started at 142lbs, went up to 160/162lbs, 5'11. No before pictures and no leg pictures. sorry.
Front dbl bi
http://img29.photobucket.com/albums/v86/loxstox/crap_-_fdb.jpg
AnabolicJake
05-10-2004, 09:40 AM
most muscular - not so good with long skinny arms
http://img29.photobucket.com/albums/v86/loxstox/MM.jpg
AnabolicJake
05-10-2004, 09:41 AM
lat spread - took this one myself
http://img29.photobucket.com/albums/v86/loxstox/back.jpg
AnabolicJake
05-10-2004, 09:41 AM
rear double bi
http://img29.photobucket.com/albums/v86/loxstox/dblback.jpg
rapidshoter
05-10-2004, 10:49 AM
Nice to see people are consurned more with the biggest muscle in the whole upper body (lats)
Good work.
Allyrulez
05-10-2004, 12:02 PM
Wow good lats indeed!!! whatcha do for them huh
McFerret85
05-10-2004, 01:13 PM
Your lats look awesome - especially in the first pic. I wish I had a V like that.
AnabolicJake
05-10-2004, 01:43 PM
I have been told that they are naturally big, thanks everyone.
my back workout consists of
bent over DB rows (2x7)
pull ups (2x7)
cable rows (2x7)
pull downs (2x7) - stupid, i know.
deadlift (3x6)
bentkarnes
05-10-2004, 04:54 PM
your arms may not be that big but man thats a crazy peak in your bicep for how thick your arms are... good work
Beast
05-10-2004, 05:18 PM
Are you anabolic, Jake? ;)
AnabolicJake
05-11-2004, 06:06 AM
your arms may not be that big but man thats a crazy peak in your bicep for how thick your arms are... good work
cheers mate. I think i lag the most in arms, followed by chest. My arms are about 14.25", they look much smaller because of how long my arms are. Which is another problem when doing most muscular. I don't know how to position my arms when I do that pose.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.