2005 Porn Convention

[kAiXuan]

Ok, I was in the greatest city in the world Las Vegas from Dec. 30th-Jan. 16 and got a chance to go to the convention this year not once, but 2x. It was the greatest convention EVER. If any of you get a chance to catch it next year or later this year in LA dont pass it up. For a mere $45 a day, you can see numerous porn stars you have jerked off to, tons of hot porn stars you have never heard of, and some of the lucky guys who get to nail them for a living. Oh yeah, and you get as many free posters and pictures that you want. On the last day, my freebie bag(s) weighed around 30lbs. So here are a few pics to summarize the occasion. Feel free to IM me and I will send you more pics of the lovely ladies.

[kAiXuan]

more

[-sin-]

Did you bring your girlfriend along?

[sublime99]

OMG dude post more, more more some with more skin. Did they have any demostartions with new products or have any practice sessions.

[TheMachine]

Are those pictures work safe?

[GrumpyTX]

I would classify them as not work safe due to some of the content in the back ground.

Give me a minute and I will fix them so you can see them safely.

[GrumpyTX]

work safe

[GrumpyTX]

jami

[GrumpyTX]

monica

[GrumpyTX]

trinity

[Manveet]

I'm still laughing at your "trojan magnum" shirt.

Good stuff!

[twm]

Holy ****, Danni Woodward is so incredibly hot

[kAiXuan]

Yeah, I got tons of looks with that shirt and everyone seemed more open and friendly possibly thinking I was in the industry. I would have to say Dani Woodward was by far the coolest girl there, I hung out with her for quite a bit. I have over 200 pics so if you want more revealing and funny pics IM me XpokerfeindX on AIM.

[Tafman]

ha u sure have quite a few pics with the male stars

[BCC]

ha u sure have quite a few pics with the male stars

Last I heard, Ron Jeremy is God, so of course.

[Gyno Rhino]

If there is any nudity being spread on the site via PMs, there will be instant banning.

I didn't see anything in the pictures you posted, so we'll leave it at that. Just be aware that this is dangerous ground.

[gino]

Boy, Ron Jeremy looked real excited to take a picture with you.

I'd like to take a stroll through there some year...

[galileo]

Unless of course you are sending the nudity to a mod. Then it is perfectly fine. :cool:

[Vido]

Holy ****, Danni Woodward is so incredibly hot

:withstupi Man, I'd love to go to one of those things...a great excuse to take a trip to Vegas too.

[Mystic Eric]

If there is any nudity being spread on the site via PMs, there will be instant banning.

I didn't see anything in the pictures you posted, so we'll leave it at that. Just be aware that this is dangerous ground.

Wow, there are so many things wrong with that post I don't know where to begin.

1. By saying that, you're implying that the mods can read the PMs that people send to each other.

2. We're regulated on what we're allowed and not allowed to say to each other via a PRIVATE pm.

[Southern Beast]

Wow, that's awesome. I'm in for next year.

[Canadian Crippler]

If anyone wants some good dani woodward, download her in Bookwork Bitches. You can find it on Limewire or whatever. She's smokin!

[Beast]

lol, that's ****ing awesome. God, Ron Jeremy is one ugly mother ****er! His head is the size of your torso.

[Pitfan04]

One ugly mother ****er with a hung ass shlong that got him laid MANY A times

[RussianRocket]

dani woodward, she looks by far the best out of all them girls. She's very cute, she's the kinda girl i'm attracted to, the others i'm not a fan off.

[Gyno Rhino]

Wow, there are so many things wrong with that post I don't know where to begin.

1. By saying that, you're implying that the mods can read the PMs that people send to each other.

2. We're regulated on what we're allowed and not allowed to say to each other via a PRIVATE pm.

I never implied that we read PMs. You need to take a logic course.

But, we do get reports from members if they've been harassed or subjected to something against the rules. And nudity is not allowed on here, PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD.

As for point #2, again, you need a course in logic. Where did I say that something you "said" to one another through a PM will get you in trouble? I said nudity. As in, using WBB to propagate pornography. Not that I have anything against porn, but you certainly don't need to be using WBB for porn - it's not exactly a hard thing to find on the web.

[Mystic Eric]

If there is any nudity being spread on the site via PMs, there will be instant banning.

I didn't see anything in the pictures you posted, so we'll leave it at that. Just be aware that this is dangerous ground.

Hmmm now you're throwing out personal attacks saying that I need to take a course in logic :clap: . Before you get all high and mighty, let's take a look at your previous post...

You said that if there is any nudity being spread on the site via PMs, there will be *INSTANT* banning...

So that means as soon as any nudity is sent through a PM, the ban will happen right away... So how would a mod know that nudity is being sent? Oh right:



But, we do get reports from members if they've been harassed or subjected to something against the rules.

So you're saying that the instant banning will occur because members will report to mods because they've been "subjected to something against the rules." Let's take a look at your scenario then:

I request to KaiXuan through PM that I want a few nude pics of that convention. He sends them to me. However, even though I knowingly and willing asked for something against the rules (nudity on wbb), I become so enraged that he has subjected me to something against the rules that I turn him in and rat him out to you guys... :thumbup:

Clearly that situation does not make sense. So how else would you guys know that nudity is being sent through PM so that you can do the INSTANT banning? Right, it's only logical to infer that your post makes it seem like mods read PMs.

So either your threat of "INSTANT" banning won't occur because you guys won't find out, OR you guys have to read PMs. So take your pick.

As for point 2, my choice of "say" is a poor one. I'll admit it. I should have used "do."

I thought we were supposed to respond to each other in a polite and courteous manner? Your smug, insulting reply is surely against the rules?

[snowster900]

your a lucky lucky man

[sublime99]

dum da dum dum, dum da dum dum daaaaaa.

[Maki Riddington]

Eric,

The mods can not read private messages. They can however ban people. Glen was simply saying that it is against the rules to send porn via pm's. If it is found out, the person who is doing the sending will be banned because they are breaking a rule.

I hope this clears up any confusion.:)

[MrWebb78]

i dont know if im comfortable sending my erotic confessions of desire to Brawl anymore then.

[SobaAddict70]

Wow, there are so many things wrong with that post I don't know where to begin.

1. By saying that, you're implying that the mods can read the PMs that people send to each other.

2. We're regulated on what we're allowed and not allowed to say to each other via a PRIVATE pm.

There are laws that regulate the content of speech in communications between respondents (whether public or private is irrelevant), so why should this be any different?

Not to mention that this site is private property and we're all here as guests of the owners of the site, so they can make whatever rules they want. Not kissing *****, just stating a fact.

Stash

[Vido]

Eric,

The mods can not read private messages. They can however ban people. Glen was simply saying that it is against the rules to send porn via pm's. If it is found out, the person who is doing the sending will be banned because they are breaking a rule.

I hope this clears up any confusion.:)

This is completely off topic, but I think Eric is just pointing out that in a rational world that could never happen. If someone asks someone else for porn, they're not going to go around and tell a mod that they were sent something against the rules. If this were the case and I was a mod, I'd be more inclined to ban the little $&#@ that told on the other guy just out of principle.

[Maki Riddington]

This is completely off topic, but I think Eric is just pointing out that in a rational world that could never happen. If someone asks someone else for porn, they're not going to go around and tell a mod that they were sent something against the rules. If this were the case and I was a mod, I'd be more inclined to ban the little $&#@ that told on the other guy just out of principle.

I understand this. What I am trying to point out is that, sending porn around WBB via private messages is prohibited. If it is found out, the person/s will be banned.

How it is found out is irrelevant.

[Mystic Eric]

There are laws that regulate the content of speech in communications between respondents (whether public or private is irrelevant), so why should this be any different?

Not to mention that this site is private property and we're all here as guests of the owners of the site, so they can make whatever rules they want. Not kissing *****, just stating a fact.

Stash

I knew someone would bring up this point and you're right. It IS private property and we have to obey Dan's rules.

However, what I'm not fine with is the fact that I've been told all along that PMs cannot be read by mods but then Gyno Rhyno comes out and implies that Mods have the power to read PMs. This bothers me because I feel like I'm being lied to and I would not want private info (such as my phone #, MSN addy or the like) that I send to a member in confidence to be read by a 3rd party.

[Maki Riddington]

Eric,

Can you accept that Glen did not mean to intentionally imply that is the case regarding mods and the reading of private messages? I think Glen does a great job on the boards and has never lied to anyone here. He contributes his time to help moderate this board and in my opinion, does a fantastic job.

[Praetorian]

I knew someone would bring up this point and you're right. It IS private property and we have to obey Dan's rules.

However, what I'm not fine with is the fact that I've been told all along that PMs cannot be read by mods but then Gyno Rhyno comes out and implies that Mods have the power to read PMs. This bothers me because I feel like I'm being lied to and I would not want private info (such as my phone #, MSN addy or the like) that I send to a member in confidence to be read by a 3rd party.


seriously dude, don't you have anything better to do than to just find small whiny bithcy things to bitch about? :rolleyes:

[biggimp]

seriously dude, don't you have anything better to do than to just find small whiny bithcy things to bitch about? :rolleyes:

good point.

and i wish i was at that convention. but the strip club is cheaper, and seems like almost as much fun. ill just keep going there. :cool:

[Mystic Eric]

Eric,

Can you accept that Glen did not mean to intentionally imply that is the case regarding mods and the reading of private messages? I think Glen does a great job on the boards and has never lied to anyone here. He contributes his time to help moderate this board and in my opinion, does a fantastic job.

I can accept that. What I pointed out was perfectly valid. If there was any confusion, he could have easily said: "I didn't mean to say that mods can read PMs." Then I would say: "Oh OK cool have a good day." Instead, he chose to throw out personal attacks and smuggly insulted my logic.

Whether or not he does a fantastic job (we can see by the way he handled this situation) is subjective.

[Beast]

So.........

Let's see some more pics!!!

[fen2zla]

Now back to the topic at hand (don't be dirty, I meant the topic that this thread is about)

Porn stars. Nice pics.

[kAiXuan]

I freely posted my AIM screenname to send more pics to those who wanted them. It seems "logical" that I would send them through there as opposed to PMS. No pun intended Gyno. By the way, there was no live girl nudity allowed at the convention, they were required to wear pasties. Although at the end of the last day, I did catch a pic of one girls ties and anothers snatch but this was in the very back at the end of the convention.

[Maki Riddington]

I can accept that.

Excellent.:)

[crazedwombat]

forget going to the O next year...WBB should go to the porn convention!!

[Manveet]

more pics!!

[kAiXuan]

more pics!!

Dude, I dont want to keep posting pics. If you want more feel free to IM me and I will send you tons.

[Wikked1]

I understand this. What I am trying to point out is that, sending porn around WBB via private messages is prohibited. If it is found out, the person/s will be banned.

This is completely :offtopic:
but is this what happened to ANDRE?
OH and I thought the original post was pretty cool....always thought it would be cool to go to but, that's for you single guys!

[Shane]

So.........

Let's see some more pics!!!


:withstupi

[Manveet]

Dude, I dont want to keep posting pics. If you want more feel free to IM me and I will send you tons.


That's alright, just PM me a bunch of nudes;)

*I'm only kidding btw*

[superdeathflame]

Get over it, the adminstrators of websites, however small and insignificant, instantly cop a god-complex upon becoming an adminstrator. The smaller and more insignificant the site, the bigger the god-complex. As you can see, this site is a very very very very small simple site, running simple off-the-shelf software on a very unimportant subject, therefore the admins have a very big god complex. Hence the behaviour of censoring anything they don't like, even if the censorship is more damaging and evil than the things they're banning people for.

[Gyno Rhino]

Get over it, the adminstrators of websites, however small and insignificant, instantly cop a god-complex upon becoming an adminstrator. The smaller and more insignificant the site, the bigger the god-complex. As you can see, this site is a very very very very small simple site, running simple off-the-shelf software on a very unimportant subject, therefore the admins have a very big god complex. Hence the behaviour of censoring anything they don't like, even if the censorship is more damaging and evil than the things they're banning people for.

ROFL.

Talk about a complex, did someone here sodomize you with an iron poker or something?

We have rules, we enforce them.

But I really appreciate your input - it makes me feel better about the state of my power-ego as it's projected onto the internet. Jesus < Gyno.

[Manveet]

Get over it, the adminstrators of websites, however small and insignificant, instantly cop a god-complex upon becoming an adminstrator. The smaller and more insignificant the site, the bigger the god-complex. As you can see, this site is a very very very very small simple site, running simple off-the-shelf software on a very unimportant subject, therefore the admins have a very big god complex. Hence the behaviour of censoring anything they don't like, even if the censorship is more damaging and evil than the things they're banning people for.

LOL, great post.

[TBone4Eva]

Get over it, the adminstrators of websites, however small and insignificant, instantly cop a god-complex upon becoming an adminstrator. The smaller and more insignificant the site, the bigger the god-complex. As you can see, this site is a very very very very small simple site, running simple off-the-shelf software on a very unimportant subject, therefore the admins have a very big god complex. Hence the behaviour of censoring anything they don't like, even if the censorship is more damaging and evil than the things they're banning people for.
http://www.funnypictures.dk/data/media/2/13.jpg :idea:






j/k

[Belial]

Get over it, the adminstrators of websites, however small and insignificant, instantly cop a god-complex upon becoming an adminstrator. The smaller and more insignificant the site, the bigger the god-complex. As you can see, this site is a very very very very small simple site, running simple off-the-shelf software on a very unimportant subject, therefore the admins have a very big god complex. Hence the behaviour of censoring anything they don't like, even if the censorship is more damaging and evil than the things they're banning people for.

200+ posts on a supposedly piece of **** board that you hardly deign worthwhile of your attention?



How.... tragic.

[Maki Riddington]

Lol.

[Daniel Clough]

Get over it, the adminstrators of websites, however small and insignificant, instantly cop a god-complex upon becoming an adminstrator. The smaller and more insignificant the site, the bigger the god-complex. As you can see, this site is a very very very very small simple site, running simple off-the-shelf software on a very unimportant subject, therefore the admins have a very big god complex. Hence the behaviour of censoring anything they don't like, even if the censorship is more damaging and evil than the things they're banning people for.

Superdeathflame,

We really appreciate your feedback, honestly we do...

But unfortunately we are going to have to ask.... sorry scratch that... enforce that you leave the forums.

It shouldn't be much of a hardship for you, us being a very very very very small simple site, running simple off-the-shelf software on a very unimportant subject.

Thanks for your contributions whilst you were here though.

[Paul Stagg]

Regarding PMs:

I've made this clear before. The moderators and administrators of the boards here respect everyone's privacy, and would not in any way violate your privacy.

If you, say, asked members here to critique your penis size and forwarded a photo to them via PM, the moderators would not tell anyone why you were banned.

But you'd get banned.

The PM system here is not in any way secure. The administrator of the boards can get access to it if he so wishes. He doesn't, but that doesn't mean you should be discussing anything sensitive via PM.

If you wish to engage in a secure conversation with another member, please use secure e-mail.

[Gyno Rhino]

That post is :cool::cool: