spanky33
03-14-2005, 04:08 PM
What's up everyone.
I have a theory, I want you guys to tell me if it makes sense, or if it's garbage.
I figure when you work out, you burn a certain number of calories. In order to gain muscle, you need to eat extra calories. Let's say someone burns 3000 calories in a day (work out and all activities included). Now let's say that person needs about 500 calories to repair and build muscles. That makes a total of 3500 calories (of course it fluctuates from day to day). Now let's say that person eats 3300 calories everyday. That person would grow bigger. And there would be no fat added to the body, cuz there really are no extra calories (deficit is always guaranteed).
Of course, the only drawback is that muscle growth isn't maximal, because you're still not feeding the body everything it needs to grow at 100%, but I think this way, there will be no fat storage.
Does this make sense?
Let me know what you think.
I have a theory, I want you guys to tell me if it makes sense, or if it's garbage.
I figure when you work out, you burn a certain number of calories. In order to gain muscle, you need to eat extra calories. Let's say someone burns 3000 calories in a day (work out and all activities included). Now let's say that person needs about 500 calories to repair and build muscles. That makes a total of 3500 calories (of course it fluctuates from day to day). Now let's say that person eats 3300 calories everyday. That person would grow bigger. And there would be no fat added to the body, cuz there really are no extra calories (deficit is always guaranteed).
Of course, the only drawback is that muscle growth isn't maximal, because you're still not feeding the body everything it needs to grow at 100%, but I think this way, there will be no fat storage.
Does this make sense?
Let me know what you think.