View Full Version : Skinny kid bulking, Pic set #2

09-23-2006, 12:15 AM
17 years old, six foot, just short of 180. It's been about a month since my first set of pictures, I hope there is a noticable difference. For comparison, check out my first thread at http://www.wannabebigforums.com/showthread.php?t=84151

Once again, all unflexed.

09-23-2006, 01:38 AM
For the lazy, here are comparison shots.

09-23-2006, 10:48 AM
It's been a month. Have patience. You're coming along.

Eat more, and cut that hair hippy ;)

09-23-2006, 08:29 PM
Your not going to see a visual difference withen a months time unless you've got some super-duper routine and taking all kinds of supplements... then maybe you will. Instead of using pictures to see improvements try measurments... you can see the difference there in a months time. My biceps grew 1/2 in a month and a half... but you can hardly tell in pictures.

09-23-2006, 09:16 PM
I'd just like to say, that the way you took the shot of your back in the first post is hliariously creative. That is all.


09-24-2006, 02:51 PM
Do you lift weights? You don't look anywhere near 180 pounds. Maybe with clothes, shoes, 10 bucks of change in your pockets, and while holding your little sister on the scale.

How strong are you? What are your stats?

09-24-2006, 03:28 PM
yeah you look about 165-170 tops in those pics man.

09-25-2006, 01:47 AM
Its like 177 in my pj's. I do weigh myself at night, which could have something to do with it.

Um, I bench 150, squat 210, and dead 205.

Maybe I'm an inch taller.

I don't know.

09-25-2006, 07:57 AM
Yeah, I'm with the guys here - are you sure that you're 180ish? You're looking good for your size, but I'd guess your size is probably closer to 165-170. What kind of scale are you using (ie, is it reliable?) If it's one in the gym, I shudder to think how heinously inaccurate it could be. I've had gym scales that fluctuate 30 lbs day-to-day. Obviously, I don't rely on those.

09-25-2006, 02:17 PM
I'm using a digital scale. But if I weighed myself first thing in the morning naked, I think the number may be a bit closer to what you guys are thinking.

09-26-2006, 12:02 AM
good job..the improvements are small, but they are there.