PDA

View Full Version : narrow stance squat for athletes



235orbust
03-14-2007, 07:27 PM
Recently a lot of the atletes in my gym have been doing squats with a more narrow stance, a little shorter then shoulder width. If you think about it, it makes some sense, becasue most of the time in sports you arent very wide, you do everything with your feet under you, unless that is you are a offensive lineman. How does everyone feel about this? Is this a good idea

Levantar
03-14-2007, 07:35 PM
I do my squats with a narrow stance. I have heard that you will work your posterior chain more with wide stance though. Either way you are working some big ass muscles and it is going to benefit your strength and overall growth.

zen
03-14-2007, 07:52 PM
if you watch film, most anything done athletically except all out sprints are not done with feet directly under, particularly sports that require a lot of agility and varied movement. I can see the point of not going sumo, but narrower than shoulder width is unnatural, if you asked me.

jtteg_x
03-15-2007, 04:16 AM
i would say it depends on what your training for. if you were squatting for vertical leap (ie: bball), it would make sense to use a narrower stance. but take football for example, some have a wider foot positioning when lining up.

ValleyFR
03-15-2007, 12:55 PM
take it from me...i have done both...and still do both. My narrow stance is in front and light weight squats... but normal squats i do with a widder grip. And i picked this up in college. My coach in high school had us pretty much go all the way down to the ground till or butt touched our heels. So you can imagine some of us were doing 375+ like that..plus with your knees bending liek that its ridiculous. Well...while i was in college i noticed everyone had a wider squat then i did...and i tried it and it almost killed me the next day how much my inner thighs burned. Wider you go the more muslces you work...and the more they will get worked. And the funny thing is...i see all theese people do their squats and i am amazed..i looked at my schools hang clean and the all school record when i left was 295, and i see freshman cleaning 315x5 times. So...obviously...my school sucks and i have a lot ot lern about thoose lifts in college.

teenathlete3030
04-11-2007, 09:15 PM
I read something from a good track website that regarded a study done on posture and athletic performance. It said that the weightlifting movements that closely resembeled the activity had greater benefits. Normally when going deep you use a narrow stance, high bar, and an upright posture. In track, upright posture is huge in many events.

On the other hand I can also see how acceleration in something like the 40 or in football you accellerate with a forward torso until you pick up speed.

Kelly Baggett actually addressed this question on his website. He said that for a beginning athlete he prefers Oly style squats. As the athlete becomes much stronger and develops closer to his potential, he should change to more of a powerlifting style squat as the focus shifts more toward the posterior chain, or something to that affect.

PoutineEh
04-11-2007, 09:34 PM
do both?

JHarris
04-14-2007, 07:43 AM
Well...while i was in college i noticed everyone had a wider squat then i did...and i tried it and it almost killed me the next day how much my inner thighs burned. Wider you go the more muslces you work...and the more they will get worked. And the funny thing is...i see all theese people do their squats and i am amazed..i looked at my schools hang clean and the all school record when i left was 295, and i see freshman cleaning 315x5 times. So...obviously...my school sucks and i have a lot ot lern about thoose lifts in college.

Wider squats dont work more muscle. They shorten the motion and put more of the load onto your posterior chain where more narrow stance squats put a bit more emphasis on your quadriceps and have a longer motion. None the less, narrow stance squats still work the same muscles, you just put more emphasis on different ones in each lift.

Also, squatting wide stance is not going to help your clean as much as squatting narrow stance is. (For an already fairly balanced person. If you have no posterior chain, more PC work would probably benefit you.) There's a reason Olympic lifters squat narrow stance, after all. Most people have better power production in a more narrow stance. (You dont see people going for a vertical test doing a sumo stance, after all.) Yes, Force = mass x acceleration, and you can normally use more weight in a wide stance. But the speed of a lift does not correlate linearly with the weight. Most people can generate much greater speed in a narrower stance. There's always an exception to the rule, though, so its not true for all athletes - just the majority of them.

Jay

kingfisher
04-18-2007, 02:59 AM
I like to back squat wide to hit the posterior chain, plus front squat in the position I catch cleans in(not on the same day). But really, if you're not doing cleans but you think the stance of your squat is the key to athletic performance, you're missing the point rather badly.