PDA

View Full Version : Sugar



OverDose
05-13-2007, 08:44 AM
hello does anyone here know or could explain to me the effects of sugar?

im lost on the subject as say a can of coke as 32g of sugar, making it bad for you? and say apple juice can have the same amount of sugar content

people have told me this is because its "natural" sugar and better for you. but isnt all sugar natural?

is there a suggested daily sugar intake around?

and is it the sugar thats bad for you or is it the extra energy not burned?

cheers

RedSpikeyThing
05-13-2007, 08:59 AM
Sucrose (table sugar) is the one that isn't good for you. It contains glucose and fructose. I don't remember the details, but it has something to do with the way your body metabolizes furctose. Processeed foods that contain sugar usually contain sucrose so, in terms of sugar content, Coke and apple juice are equally bad for you. People eat fruit containing sucrose because it isn't empty calories - it has vitamins and minerals, which are good for you.

CleverName
05-13-2007, 12:33 PM
Sugar in a whole apple and sugar in a can of coke or candy bar are vastly different. Whole fruit sugars are complex and don't break down in your mouth (candy bars do, which help cause cavities).

Here's a long article on sugar: http://health.ivillage.com/eating/enutritional/0,,pv,00.html

I wouldn't say apple juice is *bad* for you, but it's not that good either, at least when you buy it in the store. This is because it's pasteurized so any and all nutrients and enzymes are destroyed and the nutrients are added back in.

And just for the record, give up pop all together if you're still drinking it. There's no reason you should ever drink that stuff. :thumbup:

Built
05-13-2007, 01:17 PM
Sugar in a whole apple and sugar in a can of coke or candy bar are vastly different. Whole fruit sugars are complex and don't break down in your mouth (candy bars do, which help cause cavities).

You're kidding, of course.



Here's a long article on sugar: http://health.ivillage.com/eating/enutritional/0,,pv,00.html

I wouldn't say apple juice is *bad* for you, but it's not that good either, at least when you buy it in the store. This is because it's pasteurized so any and all nutrients and enzymes are destroyed and the nutrients are added back in.

And just for the record, give up pop all together if you're still drinking it. There's no reason you should ever drink that stuff. :thumbup:

The sugar profile of orange juice and of coca cola are virtually identical.

I checked. (http://www.wannabebigforums.com/showthread.php?p=1251903#post1251903)

Care to explain how your teeth know where the sugar came from, CleverName?

SkeetSkeet18
05-13-2007, 03:13 PM
^^ The enzymes in your spit break down those types of sugars faster and easier than those sugars that appear in fruits and such...

Built
05-13-2007, 05:37 PM
Um, huh?

CleverName
05-13-2007, 05:55 PM
I'm going by what my dentist told me, Built... :hello: Like Skeet said the sugars in candy break down in your mouth faster than fruits.

I didn't know about the correlation of orange juice and Coke in terms of sugars and all that... I'll be sure to stop buying orange juice! :thumbup:

Nosaj
05-13-2007, 06:01 PM
Uh, just because Coke and Orange Juice have the same sugar makeup (I didn't research this, just going off what is said, as it doesn't make a difference either way as to what I'm about to say) doesn't mean that they should both be eliminated from your diet. Orange Juice is loaded with tons of good vitamins, including a huge amount of Vitamin C. What does Coke have? Tons of High Fructose Corn Syrup, pretty much one of the most nutritionally worthless (and more of a hinderance than anything) things you can put in your body. The point is, natual sugar = carbs. Simple carbs are good pre and post workout (i.e. dextrose) and that's about it. Your other carbs should be complex throughout the day, but stuff like a baked potato won't kill you if you can afford them in your calorie consumption.

Built
05-13-2007, 06:33 PM
Tons of vitamin C? Define tons.

High fructose corn syrup is roughly 50% fructose, 50% glucose. Same as regular table sugar. And the same as orange juice.

ArchAngel777
05-13-2007, 06:42 PM
I don't even know if Fructose is really bad for you... I mean, we are told that Fructose favors liver glycogen and then Adipose tissue after that, but I have not seen anywhere stated that Fructose cannot fill muscle glycogen, just that it is prone to being stored as Adipose tissue rather than muscle glycogen... Of course, I could be wrong on this. Feel free to correct if you know for a fact that Fructose cannot be used to store muscle glycogen, ever.

As far as High Fructose Corn Syrup, yes it is roughly 45% glucose and 55% fructose in most mixes... Basically, table sugar = HFCS. A lot of people confused Corn Syrup and High Fructose Corn Syrup. They are NOT one and the same. Corn Syrup = Glucose.

Built
05-13-2007, 06:43 PM
Table sugar is sucrose: glucose and fructose.

ArchAngel777
05-13-2007, 06:46 PM
Table sugar is sucrose: glucose and fructose.

Yeah, I meant to say (concur) that HFCS is Sucrose essentially (table sugar), but said Fructose accidently. Thanks for the correction.

Built
05-13-2007, 07:10 PM
Meh - it all tastes sweet.

Unless you're taking in a lot of fructose, a little bit won't hurt you. And there are times when you want it - depletion workouts come to mind.

Now, I checked (http://www.dietitian.com/vitaminc.html)on the "tons of vitamin C" thing:


"Orange juice is frequently bought as a frozen concentrate. Frozen, reconstituted orange juice has 78% and canned orange juice has 69% of the vitamin C found in fresh squeezed orange juice. Vitamin C is destroyed during the condensing process, but canning is even harder on vitamin C. It appears that fresh squeezed orange juice is better than either frozen concentrate or canned, but remember that the highest Recommended Dietary Allowances (http://www.dietitian.com/rda.html) for vitamin C is 60 milligrams and all three forms, fresh, frozen and canned provide more than the RDA of vitamin C in 2/3 cup of orange juice."

So there's a whopping what, one hundred mg of vitamin C in a full 8 ounces of juice, which contains more sugar than coca cola? I think I'll stick to my time-release pills for the 1000 mg I take daily. If I relied on OJ for this much vitamin C, I'd be knocking back 80 ounces a day - over 200g of sugar, half of which would be fructose! My poor wee liver probably can't hold that much! Besides, I'd really rather get those 800 calories from steak!

Tethax
05-13-2007, 08:14 PM
Here's a couple links. Read, use google, and then we can compare notes.

...I'm actually more interested in reading up on fats, presently.

Holy Sugar, Batman (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar)

The Study of Sugar: Glycomics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycomics)

cheers!

Nosaj
05-13-2007, 08:47 PM
Now, I checked (http://www.dietitian.com/vitaminc.html)on the "tons of vitamin C" thing...

My amount of "tons of" was vague for a reason, I was talking about in comparrison to HFCS which, in all studies I have read, very unhealthy and leads to many unappealing health issues. I agree a Vitamin C pill is superior, which is why I too take pills for my vitamin C daily intake. I was merely stating it is at least somewhat nutritional in comparisson to HFCS, which I've personally put on my "Do not eat" list, along with Bleached carbs, etc.

Slim Schaedle
05-13-2007, 09:09 PM
Those who are refering to salivary amylase better start explaining in more detail what the hell they are talking about with the difference in sucrose, glucose, and fructose coming from fruit, and that of a candy bar...b/c at present, your argument is weak.

Built
05-13-2007, 10:25 PM
My amount of "tons of" was vague for a reason, I was talking about in comparrison to HFCS which, in all studies I have read, very unhealthy and leads to many unappealing health issues. I agree a Vitamin C pill is superior, which is why I too take pills for my vitamin C daily intake. I was merely stating it is at least somewhat nutritional in comparisson to HFCS, which I've personally put on my "Do not eat" list, along with Bleached carbs, etc.

There's nothing fundamentally different about HFCS when compared with sucrose or the sugar in fruit juice - chemically, it's the same stuff. If you're avoiding foods that contain glucose and fructose (the sugars in HFCS), you better get used to eating a rather restricted diet!

Now, I know where you're coming from here. It's extremely easy to over-consume HFCS-sweetened beverages. It's equally easy to over-consume fruit juice. The sugars are the same, and will have the same effect on the body.

Holto
05-14-2007, 10:05 AM
people have told me this is because its "natural" sugar and better for you. but isnt all sugar natural?

I can make oatmeal cookies with the same amount of white sugar VS cane sugar and difference when I eat them is HUGE.

White sugar disrupts my blood sugar and causes me to over secrete insulin. Less processed sugars like cane sugar and sucanat do not.

I don't know why exactly and I don't care. The more natural sugars make me feel a lot better after consuming them.

Blanche_Soprano
05-14-2007, 10:51 AM
There's nothing fundamentally different about HFCS when compared with sucrose or the sugar in fruit juice - chemically, it's the same stuff. If you're avoiding foods that contain glucose and fructose (the sugars in HFCS), you better get used to eating a rather restricted diet!

Now, I know where you're coming from here. It's extremely easy to over-consume HFCS-sweetened beverages. It's equally easy to over-consume fruit juice. The sugars are the same, and will have the same effect on the body.

An honest question: if HFCS and sucrose are the same thing, then why is there such a huge deal with eliminating HFCS?

I thought it was an evil in our world and should be avoided like the plague. If it is similar to sugar in fruit juices, wouldn't it just be bad, not evil?

mritche
05-14-2007, 03:44 PM
An honest question: if HFCS and sucrose are the same thing, then why is there such a huge deal with eliminating HFCS?

I thought it was an evil in our world and should be avoided like the plague. If it is similar to sugar in fruit juices, wouldn't it just be bad, not evil?

It's more politics than actual evil. HFCS is everywhere in America because the U.S. government massively subsidizes corn. It's much cheaper to put HFCS in a product than it is to use cane juice (a little better) or blackstrap molasses (sucrose with actual nutrition! But pricey...).

HFCS is slightly "worse" than sucrose because it's slightly more biased toward fructose than table sugar is, but the 5% difference isn't enough to qualify it as evil.

The lesson to take out of this: avoid all refined and/or liquid sugar, not just HFCS.

BigBossMan
05-14-2007, 04:54 PM
I was under the impression as well that sugars that come from fruit(which I believe is fructose) are better for you(in moderation) becuase they do not cause the insulin secretion and are processed much slower in the body. I thought this is why most fruits have a gylcemic index rating of less than 50 except for Bannanas and some others, But grapefruit especially has a low GI rating. But now I am a little confused and wondering if I should avoid fruits all together. I now that high GI foods are really good post workout but no other times, but now I am begining to wonder if fruit isn't the best thing.