Shocker
03-02-2002, 07:02 PM
How important is counting calories when -
A lot of the components of many foods that you eat are estimates.
the breakdowns on label are probably not accurate.
As long as you know roughly what is in the food that you are eating should you not be able to have the same results by listening to you body and the sort of food it requires. Energy levels, recovery times etc...
As soon as I eat anything outside of what I have a a label for - say I buy a meal whilst out, the whole calorie counting system just flies out the window as often I have no idea what the exact weight and colories involved with that meal is. For example, yesterday for lunch I bought some pasta with avocado and chicken - not so hard to calculate roughly, but then I ate a burger with chips and the burger had various stuff and sauces on it and the chips I think were cooked in oil which I put tomato sauce on, then I ate a roast beef dinner with potatoes and pumpkin and gravy/mint sauce with a couple of beers and that was just my lunch since I forgot to bring anything to work with me...
If I got a breakdown of calories in the gravy off the net for example, is that going to be the same as what I ate. Or the meat, which I dont know the exact quality of, the bread, even the beers.
Maybe it is important whilst cutting I guess but when bulking, why not just at as much as possible in roughly the right ratios and at the right times?
I see a lot of people have it all neatly set out and calculated and I dont think that this is at all accurate. When I get too fat I just stop eating so much.
Is this wrong?
A lot of the components of many foods that you eat are estimates.
the breakdowns on label are probably not accurate.
As long as you know roughly what is in the food that you are eating should you not be able to have the same results by listening to you body and the sort of food it requires. Energy levels, recovery times etc...
As soon as I eat anything outside of what I have a a label for - say I buy a meal whilst out, the whole calorie counting system just flies out the window as often I have no idea what the exact weight and colories involved with that meal is. For example, yesterday for lunch I bought some pasta with avocado and chicken - not so hard to calculate roughly, but then I ate a burger with chips and the burger had various stuff and sauces on it and the chips I think were cooked in oil which I put tomato sauce on, then I ate a roast beef dinner with potatoes and pumpkin and gravy/mint sauce with a couple of beers and that was just my lunch since I forgot to bring anything to work with me...
If I got a breakdown of calories in the gravy off the net for example, is that going to be the same as what I ate. Or the meat, which I dont know the exact quality of, the bread, even the beers.
Maybe it is important whilst cutting I guess but when bulking, why not just at as much as possible in roughly the right ratios and at the right times?
I see a lot of people have it all neatly set out and calculated and I dont think that this is at all accurate. When I get too fat I just stop eating so much.
Is this wrong?