|
||||||||||||||||||||
WoW!
Microsoft Dividend
There is currently alot of emphasis on dividends.. it will probably boost the stock price.
Squats work better than supplements.
"You know, if I thought like that, I'd never put more than one plate on the bar for anything, I'd never use bands or chains, I'd never squat to parallel or below, and I'd never let out the slightest grunt when I lift. At some point in your lifting career (assuming you're planning on getting reasonably strong and big), you're going to have to accept that most people think you are some kind of freak." -Sensei
"You're wrong, and I have a completely irrelevant pubmed abstract that may or may not say so." - Belial
I has a blog.
I has a facebook.
Generally it hurts the stock price when you declare a dividend since it lowers the company net value.
"We fight our battles, we wage our wars, we settle the score, with honor and blood" - Atreyu
Dontate to my favorite charity!
Dividends do not hurt or help stock prices per se, it is dependent on investor perception of the company as a whole.
-Company is in a growth cycle needing more capital for growth --> dividends hurt the stock.
-Company is in a stable cycle with enough capital for growth --> dividends are optional.
-Company is in any cycle with earnings exceeding groth capital needs --> dividends are necessary for investor value.
0.3% dividend yield is pointless. This is Microsoft attempting to appeal to the investors that have traditionally seen dividends in cash flow company as being an indicator of corporate stability.
Personally I don't care about the dividends that MSFT puts out
what I want to know is where they developed decreased sales
(as compared to outlook) and increased EPS. This can indicate
a change in the companies reporting or an increase in the
company efficiency or a change in the sector environment or the
economy or a number of other things.
Last edited by Tiare; 01-17-2003 at 08:37 AM.
Now in pain, only working out the walking sticks.
Agreed on all points, well said.Originally posted by Tiare
Dividends do not hurt or help stock prices per se, it is dependent on investor perception of the company as a whole.
-Company is in a growth cycle needing more capital for growth --> dividends hurt the stock.
-Company is in a stable cycle with enough capital for growth --> dividends are optional.
-Company is in any cycle with earnings exceeding groth capital needs --> dividends are necessary for investor value.
0.3% dividend yield is pointless. This is Microsoft attempting to appeal to the investors that have traditionally seen dividens in cash flow company as being an indicator of corporate stability.
"We fight our battles, we wage our wars, we settle the score, with honor and blood" - Atreyu
Dontate to my favorite charity!
You are assuming investors are basing their descisions on value.Originally posted by Y2A
Generally it hurts the stock price when you declare a dividend since it lowers the company net value.
Many (most) don't. Ref: Amazon.
With the issues facing the average investor now (volatility in the market), there is a lot of emphasis on stocks that will produce income.
Squats work better than supplements.
"You know, if I thought like that, I'd never put more than one plate on the bar for anything, I'd never use bands or chains, I'd never squat to parallel or below, and I'd never let out the slightest grunt when I lift. At some point in your lifting career (assuming you're planning on getting reasonably strong and big), you're going to have to accept that most people think you are some kind of freak." -Sensei
"You're wrong, and I have a completely irrelevant pubmed abstract that may or may not say so." - Belial
I has a blog.
I has a facebook.
Youre right, also helping that is the fact that the interest rate is so damn low that it makes dividend producing stock more attractive.Originally posted by Paul Stagg
You are assuming investors are basing their descisions on value.
Many (most) don't. Ref: Amazon.
With the issues facing the average investor now (volatility in the market), there is a lot of emphasis on stocks that will produce income.
"We fight our battles, we wage our wars, we settle the score, with honor and blood" - Atreyu
Dontate to my favorite charity!
By 'most' investors, I'm assuming that you mean volume ofOriginally posted by Paul Stagg
You are assuming investors are basing their descisions on value.
Many (most) don't. Ref: Amazon.
With the issues facing the average investor now (volatility in the market), there is a lot of emphasis on stocks that will produce income.
people not money. A million people with $10 each make much
worse decisions than 1 person with $10mm.
Real money is not concerned about the stock market right now but rather the economy and re-investment risks, IMO.
Last edited by Tiare; 01-17-2003 at 09:15 AM.
Bookmarks