I just rented both those movies today. Haven't seen either one. I know Red Dragon is the prequel. Which movie do you suggest I watch first? (I have seen Hannibal)
"They will spend their nights dreaming of six-pack
abs and a rock hard physique, little do they realize eventually we will reach
our goal and they will be dreaming of the body we walk around with every
day…only then will they understand." -- Severed Ties
"There are 6 billion people in this world, and I'm #1." -- me
It really doesn't make too much difference. Red Dragon is a prequel as far as time line but they are pretty much 2 totally different movies. IMO of course.
What is elite?
"Those who work the hardest often complain the least." -anonymous
Pain is inevitable. Suffering is optional.
doesn't matter, they're both great movies
While we may not be able to control all that happens to us, we can control what happens inside us. -- Ben Franklin
Founding Member and CEO of the FFFA
"All that matters is beauty on the inside! Outside beauty doesn't matter!"
~This is something ugly people say to feel better about themselves...
"Strength and size don't matter! It's not fair to judge training knowledge based on strength and size!"
~This is something wussy people say to feel better about themselves...
Pearls of Wisdom...
Resident Ninja Demon (with a pet Radioactive Sloth) and SchlonkeyMaster of WBB!
Rock is my 'Big Viking Brother', and not in a homo-esque way.
And no COLON jokes, bastards!
Silence is better IMO.
You kill me in a dream, you better wake up and apologize....
See silence of the lambs first.. It is the original. Red dragon is good too, but even though it is a prequil, Silence of the lambs must be seen first in order to establish lecter's charachter. You will appreciate red dragon more after seeing silence of the lambs.
Red Dragon was great.
Last edited by Manveet; 04-04-2003 at 10:12 PM.
"It is often said, mainly by the "no-contests", that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thought it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?"
"Out of all of the sects in the world, we notice an uncanny coincidence: the overwhelming majority just happen to choose the one that their parents belong to. Not the sect that has the best evidence in its favour, the best miracles, the best moral code, the best cathedral, the best stained glass, the best music: when it comes to choosing from the smorgasbord of available religions, their potential virtues seem to count for nothing, compared to the matter of heredity. This is an unmistakable fact; nobody could seriously deny it. Yet people with full knowledge of the arbitrary nature of this heredity, somehow manage to go on believing in their religion, often with such fanaticism that they are prepared to murder people who follow a different one."
"Bah. You know I hate poor people."
Silence of the Lambs is genius