The Five Biggest Contradictions in Fitness
Latest Article

The Five Biggest Contradictions in Fitness

Its no secret that when people contradict themselves, it has the effect of making the flaws in their actions or statements seem glaringly obvious. But what about when WE ourselves get caught contradicting ourselves by someone else?

By: Nick Tumminello Added: January 6th, 2014
More Recent Articles
Contrast Training for Size
By: Lee Boyce
An Interview with Marianne Kane of Girls Gone Strong
By: Jordan Syatt
What Supplements Should I be Taking? By: Jay Wainwright
Bench Like a Girl By: Julia Ladewski
Some Thoughts on Building a Big Pull By: Christopher Mason

Facebook Join Facebook Group       Twitter Follow on Twitter       rss Subscribe via RSS
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member IronDiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    593

    IPF weightclass changes?

    This is what I hear

    it's been confirmed that effective January 1st, 2011 the IPF will shift it's weight classes to:

    Women: (kg) 43 47 52 57 63 72 84 84+
    Men: (kg) 52 58 66 74 83 93 105 120 120+

    I have no idea what exactly they plan to do about records but it's assumed that they will be retired and be starting with a fresh slate on January 1st.
    Not a fan. I dunno if I should drop to 105 or eat till 120... only 5kg away from 120...
    Best unequipped meet lifts - 120kg Open class
    Sq: 629lbs
    Bp: 330lbs
    Dl: 585lbs
    Training since Dec 2008.

  2.    Support Wannabebig and use AtLarge Nutrition Supplements!


  3. #2
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    Yea I saw that. I really feel they're moving toward a RAW IPF Worlds and dropping the single-ply and thus, want to start a clean slate. If it was about cleaning out the records of the past, why do it now? This is evidenced even more by the whole RUM-IPF clash all of a sudden. They want their Raw worlds to be timed at the beginning of the year and don't want lifters doing Eric's meet. I believe they might sacrifice their gear approval costs to open the sport internationally to more lifters, since gear is expensive, raw lifting is easier to promote and to get into than equipped.

    I don't have a problem with restructuring classes. I'll conform as long as there is competition on big stages. The only thing that bugs me is that no other federations will do this, and the PWatch/PUSA rankings now become a mess.

    But until you see an official statement on the IPF site or the IPF general assembly minutes with this in place, don't make any drastic changes.
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  4. #3
    Senior Member IronDiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    593
    Yea I am currently dropping a little bit of weight as is. But I didn't really wana drop down to 105. My gear is gunna be baggy hah. I think I'm gunna have to compete in january so I can set a bunch of national records for a short while haha.
    Best unequipped meet lifts - 120kg Open class
    Sq: 629lbs
    Bp: 330lbs
    Dl: 585lbs
    Training since Dec 2008.

  5. #4
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    http://www.powerlifting-ipf.com/file...da_GA_2010.pdf

    This is the Agenda from the General Congress. Many of these proposals are raised every year, only to get turned down. You have country contigents that want to get rid of equipment period. You also then have contigents that want to allow a more general definition of "sternum," which would open up to allowable belly benching. It seems half want to get rid of equipment, half to keep it and embrace it.
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  6. #5
    Administrator chris mason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    12,609
    **** the IPF. No, not the lifters, the ferderation. **** em!


    AtLarge Nutrition Supplements Get the best supplements and help support Wannabebig!

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by chris mason View Post
    **** the IPF. No, not the lifters, the ferderation. **** em!
    I'm pretty ignorant when it comes to the politics related to the different federations, but I think I pretty much know what the IPF is all about. What's the reasoning behind this comment?

  8. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Fort Collins CO
    Posts
    1,829
    Quote Originally Posted by chris mason View Post
    **** the IPF. No, not the lifters, the ferderation. **** em!
    Wow, angry much there Chris? Sheesh, chill out. As the owner of the site, you should show a bit more class, especially considering there are probably quite a few IPF lifters here.

  9. #8
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    The other factor in play is this may be a last ditch effort to cater to the IOC. The World Games are great, but I'm not sure re-writing history is a good way to go about things for a chance at the olympic stage. I don't care what anyone says, PLing, untested or tested, raw/single/multi, will never be in the Olympics. I think the EC feels that Raw Lifting + new weight classes + erased generation and affiliation with failed tests = recognition. The IPF does put on a professional meet atmosphere, similar to what you'd find in the IWF (judges with suits, strict adherence to rules, WADA compliance, OMT testing), but I don't think the IOC wants another weightlifting discipline period.

    I understand that the international IPF scene has a different weighting as far as lifters in each weight class across populations. The US in total (not just USAPL) is very heavy, as most lifters are say above the 90kg class. This is not the case with international affiliates, many of whom only have IPF-based orgs in their countries.

    It just seems that 30 or 40 voters at the Congress took the history of the sport into their hands. I'm very interested to see the minutes and see what changes come about.
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  10. #9
    Senior Member IronDiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    593
    It is rather sad to see some of the records set by legends be reset but I guess that just means that new lifters will just have to come in and re set them.
    On the upside its forcing me to drop to 105kg's and be less of a fatty haha, also being that pl in Canada is so small, combining weight classes is nice and will make it more competitive for a lot of lifters. However I can see how USAPL weight classes are going to become over saturated by the sheer numbers of lifters they have.

    Also looks like bench rules have lightened up a bunch. Also banned lifters lose world records and can never set another WR.
    Best unequipped meet lifts - 120kg Open class
    Sq: 629lbs
    Bp: 330lbs
    Dl: 585lbs
    Training since Dec 2008.

  11. #10
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    I'm very surprised they lightened up on the bench rules. They do make sense in the grand scheme of things. Especially since I've lifted at nationals that didn't have non-slip flooring and lots of people got red-lighted for feet movement.

    I like deeper classes. I've wanted an excuse to hang up the equipment for awhile and cut weight, and 93 kgs is alot more tempting than 90 lol. Either way, I don't think I'll be getting any new equipment for a while. My equipment fits perfectly at 100 kgs. 105kgs is pushing it and 93 kgs the equipment will be real loose. What's to say they don't change the classes again in a year haha.
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  12. #11
    Senior Member IronDiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    593
    I'm in the same boat. My gear fits me near perfect where I am, to gain to 120 would be just too tight. 105 might be too loose, but I'm sure still usable for the time being.
    Best unequipped meet lifts - 120kg Open class
    Sq: 629lbs
    Bp: 330lbs
    Dl: 585lbs
    Training since Dec 2008.

  13. #12
    Bad Attitude Gym AdamBAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    986
    Isn't this just a proposal? Are we getting worked up about nothing?
    750/500/690 APF Elite @ 242

    Bench Only - Multi Ply SPF - 600 @ 275 (251)

    Bench Only - Single Ply USAPL - 501 @ 275 (255)

    Bench Only - Single Ply SPF - 550 @ 259 (257)

  14. #13
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  15. #14
    Bad Attitude Gym AdamBAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    986
    Quote Originally Posted by BloodandThunder View Post
    Well, I guess it isn't just a proposal then. I saw in other places that this was believed to be a proposal, but that information must be wrong according to this.
    750/500/690 APF Elite @ 242

    Bench Only - Multi Ply SPF - 600 @ 275 (251)

    Bench Only - Single Ply USAPL - 501 @ 275 (255)

    Bench Only - Single Ply SPF - 550 @ 259 (257)

  16. #15
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    Yea, I'm taking it with a grain of salt until I read it on the IPF congress minutes or an official statement is made.

    However, I have kids that need to qualify for College Nationals who are doing a January meet. So they're in limbo right now. Also have kids that are qualified, but have no idea if their totals will be honored for a 2011 national meet.
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  17. #16
    Senior Member IronDiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    593
    ^ I just qualified for nationals next year so I guess we will see what I qualified for lol.
    Best unequipped meet lifts - 120kg Open class
    Sq: 629lbs
    Bp: 330lbs
    Dl: 585lbs
    Training since Dec 2008.

  18. #17
    Bad Attitude Gym AdamBAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    986
    It seems like a really strange rule change. I can't remember anyone complaining about it.

    I can understand changes on the bench rules, but there have been a lot of disagreements on the "sternum" rule.

    There just doesn't appear to be any issue with the weight classes...so why change it?
    750/500/690 APF Elite @ 242

    Bench Only - Multi Ply SPF - 600 @ 275 (251)

    Bench Only - Single Ply USAPL - 501 @ 275 (255)

    Bench Only - Single Ply SPF - 550 @ 259 (257)

  19. #18
    Senior Member IronDiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    593
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamBAG View Post
    It seems like a really strange rule change. I can't remember anyone complaining about it.

    I can understand changes on the bench rules, but there have been a lot of disagreements on the "sternum" rule.

    There just doesn't appear to be any issue with the weight classes...so why change it?
    Because they are the IOC's bitches.
    Best unequipped meet lifts - 120kg Open class
    Sq: 629lbs
    Bp: 330lbs
    Dl: 585lbs
    Training since Dec 2008.

  20. #19
    Bad Attitude Gym AdamBAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    986
    Quote Originally Posted by IronDiggy View Post
    Because they are the IOC's bitches.
    Would these new weight classes somehow line up with what the IOC uses for weight lifting?
    750/500/690 APF Elite @ 242

    Bench Only - Multi Ply SPF - 600 @ 275 (251)

    Bench Only - Single Ply USAPL - 501 @ 275 (255)

    Bench Only - Single Ply SPF - 550 @ 259 (257)

  21. #20
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamBAG View Post
    Would these new weight classes somehow line up with what the IOC uses for weight lifting?
    No, they don't. In IWF, a heavyweight is 105kg (231) and plus.
    IWF also restructured their weightclasses twice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._weightlifting

    However, the IOC would like fewer weight classes than the original 10/11. This ensures more balanced teams and enables smaller countries to stay competitive. The new classes basically came about because of the drug scandals at the 88 games where a few teams pretty much failed. The IOC even wanted weightlifting out of the games at that point. http://www.dynamic-eleiko.com/sporti...ticles006.html
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  22. #21
    Bad Attitude Gym AdamBAG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    986
    Quote Originally Posted by BloodandThunder View Post
    No, they don't. In IWF, a heavyweight is 105kg (231) and plus.
    IWF also restructured their weightclasses twice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._weightlifting

    However, the IOC would like fewer weight classes than the original 10/11. This ensures more balanced teams and enables smaller countries to stay competitive. The new classes basically came about because of the drug scandals at the 88 games where a few teams pretty much failed. The IOC even wanted weightlifting out of the games at that point. http://www.dynamic-eleiko.com/sporti...ticles006.html
    So the thought is that the IPF is decreasing the # of weight classes in order to further the goal of getting into the olympics?
    750/500/690 APF Elite @ 242

    Bench Only - Multi Ply SPF - 600 @ 275 (251)

    Bench Only - Single Ply USAPL - 501 @ 275 (255)

    Bench Only - Single Ply SPF - 550 @ 259 (257)

  23. #22
    NASA KY CHAIRMAN NASAKYCHAIRMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    GREAT BLUEGRASS STATE
    Posts
    1,158
    I support the rule change 100%! I plan to do my first IPF meet in 2012.

    Wednesday, 10. November 2010 IPF Website
    2010 IPF General Assembly-excerpt of some decisions
    Category: World

    Here are some information regarding the decisions of the 2010 IPF General Assembly

    * Johnny Graham (USA) was elected as IPF Vice President

    * New weight classes beginning 1st of January 2011 on international and regional level

    Women: up to 43 kg (Sub-Junior/Junior); 47 kg; 52 kg; 57 kg; 63 kg; 72 kg; 84 kg; +84 kg

    Men: up to 53 kg (Sub-Junior/Junior); 59 kg; 66 kg; 74 kg; 83 kg; 93 kg; 105 kg; 120 kg; +120 kg

    * In connection with the new weight classes new world and regional standards will be introduced and the current record list will be frozen 31st of December 2010

    * World and International records can only achieved on World or Regional championships. To achieve World and International records on national championships it is not longer valid.

    * The current approved list is frozen until 31st December 2014. No new equipment will be approved.

    * Decisions about Technical Rules will be made by the Executive Committee together with every 2 members of the Technical Committee, Women Committee, Athletes Commission and Coach Commission. A 2/3 majority within this group is necessary for changes.

    * Bench Press:

    - It was deleted: Any pronounced and exaggerated uneven extension of the arms during the lift.

    - Feet movement flat on the floor/block/plates are allowed

    - Impairment form is deleted.

    * Probably July 2012 we host in Sweden an IPF/Eleiko World Powerlifting Classics Championship. This is an unequipped event. Information will follow.

    More decisions you will find then in the Minutes, which will be published soon.
    TRAIN HARD

    "BIG WILLIE" J.T. HALL

    http://www.youtube.com/user/NASAKYCHAIRMAN
    http://www.houseofpain.com/blog.html?search_author=9

    611 MISS ATTEMPT AT THE 2008 BP NATIONALS
    562lb DRUG-FREE COMPETITION BENCH PRESS
    491 COMPETITION UNEQUIPPED BENCH PRESS
    2008 & 2009 NASA PRO BENCH PRESS CHAMPION
    #1 DRUG-FREE BENCH PRESSER IN KY

  24. #23
    Dr. Subtotal
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,370
    I like the feet movement flat rule and the uneven extension rule. Just makes the competitor worry more about bench pressing the weight than "OMG did I move my foot or OMG I locked out 1/10 second faster with my right arm." The IPF Raw Worlds is in July, interesting since many IPF national meets are in the early summer time frame to allow competitors to peak for November's Worlds.

    Bench handoffs are still in play, thankfully some contingents had common sense.
    Setting WR's only at World and Regional meets puts more pressure on competitors to go to World meets to up the quality of each class. Makes sense. The approved list is frozen which means that whole issue doesn't come into play. It's nice the old records are frozen, like IWF did. Alot of hard work went into those records, many of them by clean lifters and their efforts will still be listed.
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead
    http://www.wannabebig.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=132318

    Satisfaction is the Death of Desire...

  25. #24
    Senior Member IronDiggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    593
    I like the bench rule changes, I use my squat shoes for bench and my feet have a tendency to slip when I get leg drive. I've missed a couple attempts this way....
    Best unequipped meet lifts - 120kg Open class
    Sq: 629lbs
    Bp: 330lbs
    Dl: 585lbs
    Training since Dec 2008.

  26. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,993
    Good news is that if you don't like the new rules you can choose not to lift in the ipf.
    Best Lifts unequipped
    765
    505
    755
    Best lifts Equipped
    1050
    840
    715

    Thankfully Representing AtLarge Nutrition and EliteFTS

Similar Threads

  1. Metal Viking IPF squatter
    By brauny96 in forum Powerlifting and Strength Training
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2010, 06:51 PM
  2. For those of you that follow IPF
    By Clifford Gillmore in forum Powerlifting and Strength Training
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-19-2009, 05:30 AM
  3. Metal IPF King gear
    By jtteg_x in forum Powerlifting and Strength Training
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-20-2008, 04:41 PM
  4. Metal IPF Squatter
    By jtteg_x in forum Powerlifting and Strength Training
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-30-2007, 04:41 AM
  5. Metal IPF vs Metal IPF Viking
    By jtteg_x in forum Powerlifting and Strength Training
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-07-2007, 10:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •