Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: Technical Q for LAM, BenchMonster and/or other "Big Benchers".

  1. #1
    Overtrainer.
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    766

    Technical Q for LAM, BenchMonster and/or other "Big Benchers".

    Hi benchamatics. Could someone tell me which muscles are involved at which parts of the bench ROM.

    I have a standard grip, elbows not completely in but definitely not flared out.

    My main weak spot is about 3 inches after the bar has left my chest.

    Any help will be greatly appreciated.


  2. #2

  3. #3
    Senior Member hemants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    1,569
    Just a thought but you could try starting with the bar lower on your chest at the bottom and then push it on a slight angle so that the bar is above your shoulders at the top. I find this helps with the sticky point you mentioned.
    If the only thing you are holding is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

  4. #4
    WBB's Juggernaut/Liason BigCorey75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The only place where you can mix Alcohol and Live Ammunition and its called a "Family Outing", Texas
    Posts
    4,404
    try speed work and some triceps work, usuall when you get stuck off of the chest that means your not exploding enough off of your chest, try some dynamic work to help increase bar speed off of the chest, also work the shoulders alot, they help in the lifting right off of the chest, also finally the triceps to help with the lock out.
    Why live if one can not Deadlift?- John Paul Sigmasson

    Accept that which is useful and reject what is not- Bruce Lee

    Reason and Logic trump religion- Me

    Restriction of education, Censorship of knowledge, and Proliferation of religion helps keep the masses tamed- Me

    "Money does not fix everything, Smart fixes everything"

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    104
    chest/shoulders

    speed work will help, as will plyometrics

  6. #6
    . Delphi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,020
    Tate is pretty adamant that lats are heavily involved in bench pressing. More so than pecs. Your shoulder blades need to be squeezed together to get maximum advantage from your lats. And of course triceps are important at lockout.

    Edit: meant triceps, not pecs in the last sentence.
    Last edited by Delphi; 08-25-2003 at 09:57 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Meat_Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,315
    Originally posted by Delphi
    Tate is pretty adamant that lats are heavily involved in bench pressing. More so than pecs. Your shoulder blades need to be squeezed together to get maximum advantage from your lats. And of course pecs are important at lockout.
    Lats don't move the bar, but if you've reached a high level of development they can certainly aid the lift.

    I'd say work your pecs and triceps, but most importantly your front delts. They are used in ALL presses, and are the most heavily used in bench pressing(slightly depending on your build and form).

  8. #8
    Administrator chris mason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    12,682
    Here is an excerpt from the Fred Hatfield book The Complete Guide to Powerlifting :




    A few other points. If a lifter assumes a radical arch, as he should, during a maximal bench press attempt, and he compresses his shoulder blades as previously mentioned, the lats will move the bar. One of the functions of the lats is to lower the shoulders (depress the scapula). When a bencher achieves a radical arch, depressing the scapula occurs at the beginning of the press. An extreme arch starts essentially mimics a decline press. When the body is in this position the lats can be used to help initiate the press off of the chest.

    It also sounds to me like your sticking point is where deltoid involvement becomes reduced relative to pectoral and tricep involvement. Dr. Hatfield recommends that a lifter who uses a narrow to moderate width grip try the following technique. As the sticking point is reached sharpy flare the elbows out (perpindicular to the body) in order to maximize pectoral involvement. If you bench with a wider grip the problem, according to Dr. Hatfield, is probably due to pectoral and/or tricep relative weakness.

    Try using the table referenced to help determine your best technique. Keep in mind that this table does not take into account leverage factors due to muscle insertions and that some experimentation is always best.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by chris mason; 08-26-2003 at 07:47 AM.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Kitchener, ON
    Posts
    11,341
    some advice from the powerlifting coach i recently trained with:

    - split the diff. with your elbows -- shoot for a 45 degree angle to your body or so.
    - don't push down along your body, push up... if you're stalling in midlift, try bringing the bar a little closer to the top of your body

  10. #10
    Senior Member benchmonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    414
    OK, here's the deal. Coming off the chest, it is pecs and lats that are moving the bar. Tate says lats more than pecs and I don't disagree, but both play a role.

    Triceps, if used correctly are working the entire length of the press but are most important at the top part of the lift.

    The midsection of the lift is dominated by front delts.

    So basically the bar is launched with pecs/lats, then the front delts take over to get through the middle 3rd of the lift.

    Then the triceps finish off the lift.

    Now, this is a bit oversimplified, as all muscles are flexed and working the entire length of the press.

    And if you are stalling 3 inches above your chest, work on upper back development, get a better arch, and work on upping your bar speed. You also might consider benching in a shirt more. The shirt acts like extra pec and front delt muscles, which helps you through this difficult and dangerous lower end of the press.

    B.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Meat_Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,315
    Sorry, I know the lats are used in the bench press, but I don't understand how they could move the bar at all, seeing as how they are responsible for pulling your arms in the opposite direction the bar is moving in the bench press. If you were upside down decline press, which no one does, your lats would be moving the bar with your chest, but on a flat bench, I don't see how lats would make a significant difference in your bench press.

  12. #12
    Player Hater PowerManDL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    7,850
    The arch.
    Vin Diesel has a fever.. and the only prescription is more cowbell.

    Budiak: That girl I maced
    Budiak: macked
    Budiak: heh maced
    Budiak: I wish

    ShmrckPmp5: a good thing people can't fire guns through the computer...your ass would have been shot years ago

    Y2A 47: youre smooth as hell
    Y2A 47: thats why you get outta tickets, and into panties

    galileo: you're a fucking beast and I hate you
    galileo: hate

    assgrabbers are never subtile, they will grabb ass whereever they go,public or not, I know the type, because I am one. - Rock

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    104
    When the bar is on your chest, your arm is below your back somewhat. For the short range of motion off your chest until the arms are even with the body, the lats will be used.

  14. #14
    Senior Member benchmonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    414
    Well meathead, find me a 600+ bencher with small lats, then I will admit that lats don't have anything to do with bench pressing. Best upper backs outside of the bodybuilding world are attached to big bench pressers.

    B.

  15. #15
    Administrator chris mason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    12,682
    Possibly true, but that response doesn't really prove your point. Those big guys obviously have good genetics for size and strength and equally obviously they train their backs directly for assistance work.

    MeatHead, as I said in the above post it has to do with the severe arch of the back and other factors. A severe enough arch almost makes the movement like a decline press. This places the muscles of the upper back in a position to provide both assistance and stabilization (depending on the muscles used). In addition, you can do a little self experimentation. Get into the bench press position (bottom of the movement). Once you are set, consciously spread your lats and see what happens. This is yet another way they help to move the bar.

  16. #16
    . Delphi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,020
    If you look at all the articles written by Simmons and Tate over at Deepsquatter.com you won't find any recommendations to work the pecs at all. No flyes, no cable crossovers, no pec deck work. They do recommend in some of the articles that you do some lat work, though.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Meat_Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,315
    Originally posted by Delphi
    If you look at all the articles written by Simmons and Tate over at Deepsquatter.com you won't find any recommendations to work the pecs at all. No flyes, no cable crossovers, no pec deck work. They do recommend in some of the articles that you do some lat work, though.

    So you need strong lats and triceps to have a good bench, not strong pecs.... I don't buy, and I don't dig.

    Flies, cable crossovers, and pec deck work are for size mainly. Flies have some possible benefit to your bench, but mostly only when you get into heavier DB's. Regardless, strong pecs are essential to any big bencher, no matter what proportions they have and what form they use.

    Just because Simmons and Tate recommended it doesn't mean its the only possible or best way. Individuals are too different to say that if everyone bumped their tricep and lat training up their bench would skyrocket. Not everyone needs that.

    I say train all the muscles you use in the bench if you want a big bench. You'll find your weak points, and when you do, work on them. Your weak points may not be your triceps, for example. It may be your delts, or pecs, or simply form. It could be a section of the lift that is mostly stressing pecs. It could be a number of things that aren't necissarily lats and triceps.

    Now that I've had a chance to rant... I'm gonna go lift...

  18. #18
    Senior Member Meat_Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,315
    Originally posted by benchmonster
    Well meathead, find me a 600+ bencher with small lats, then I will admit that lats don't have anything to do with bench pressing. Best upper backs outside of the bodybuilding world are attached to big bench pressers.

    B.
    No offense, but thats a moot point.

    Show me a man who can bench 600+ who doesn't have big calves, or hamstrings, or erectors, or biceps, or abs.

    A man who can do that will be big and strong everywhere, not just because he trains the lift, but because he's genetically gifted, and likely has a pretty large anabolic bill to.

  19. #19
    . Delphi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,020
    Originally posted by xMeat_Headx

    Just because Simmons and Tate recommended it doesn't mean its the only possible or best way.

    Agreed.

  20. #20
    Senior Member unshift's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    692
    funny, last i recally these people are benching a hell of a lot more than you are.

    i've stopped doing direct pec work (no flyes, etc) and my bench has went up a bit. granted, it's still weak as hell, but it's certainly gone up about 50lbs over the summer.

    training all the muscles is fine, but guess what, when you're benching in the gym you ARE training all the muscles. it's just that they're saying that theres no need to _emphasize_ working the pecs, cause in the majority of cases they probably won't be the sticking point. if you're benching properly, they'll get worked and accustomed to the lift, but doing pec work like flyes and whatnot probably won't be very beneficial

  21. #21
    Senior Member Meat_Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,315
    Originally posted by unshift
    funny, last i recally these people are benching a hell of a lot more than you are.


    If you mean the people on WBB, yes there are some impressive lifts here. But mostly those are performed by veteran lifters, who are many years my senior.

    For a 186lb 17 year old guy, I don't think 200+ is so bad either, especially considering that my bench was over 50lbs less a year ago, and I haven't been training for it directly.

    i've stopped doing direct pec work (no flyes, etc) and my bench has went up a bit. granted, it's still weak as hell, but it's certainly gone up about 50lbs over the summer.
    What's to say it wouldn't have gone up more if you had done pec work? Nothing.

    What's to say it would? Nothing.

    That's another moot point.

    training all the muscles is fine, but guess what, when you're benching in the gym you ARE training all the muscles. it's just that they're saying that theres no need to _emphasize_ working the pecs, cause in the majority of cases they probably won't be the sticking point. if you're benching properly, they'll get worked and accustomed to the lift, but doing pec work like flyes and whatnot probably won't be very beneficial
    Right... and there's no need to do lat work or tricep work or delt work either, because they get worked by the lift right?

    And NO one has a sticking point that is because of their weak pecs, regardless of the fact that in many cases the pecs are what moves almost all of the weight, right?

    This is just an observation, but if I'm correct, about 80% of sticking points for people are about 2-4 inches off the chest. That is going to be mainly pecs and shoulders moving the bar.

    But that doesn't matter. All of the muscles used in the lift should be worked and strengthened. None should be given extreme special treatment(i.e. 10 sets for triceps or lats or delts during westside like programs) and none should be neglected.

    Just my take on things...
    Last edited by Meat_Head; 08-27-2003 at 08:41 PM.

  22. #22
    One crazy MOFO/Mail man
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    T dot
    Posts
    2,295
    For someone so young and inexperienced you seem to be very sure that you are more knowledgable then the rest.
    w00t

  23. #23
    Senior Member unshift's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    692
    i agree everything should be worked, but benching is probably enough pec work. or at least different forms of benching -- inclines, floor press, board press, etc.

    basically i think the point here is that strengthening your "inner" and "upper" chest is useless -- instead you need to work on things which drive the lift, especially for an elite bencher. most people you see in the gym will do flyes (cable flyes especially -- most worthless exercise ever) hoping to increase their bench, when in reality, the pecs are getting plenty of work with thorough benching but it is other factors holding back the lift.

  24. #24
    Player Hater PowerManDL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    7,850
    Two things:

    1) No matter what you might think, Westside produces the best benchers (well, Metal Militia...but I'm talking on the whole) in the world. Not only that, but they do it consistently. That should say something about their methods.

    2) Westside is designed for competitive powerlifters. Competitive is the key word, as it means they will be using equipment. "Weak" pectorals would only be apparent right off the chest in a PL bench style. If you're using a shirt, you won't even notice. Strong lats, however, will make quite a difference.
    Vin Diesel has a fever.. and the only prescription is more cowbell.

    Budiak: That girl I maced
    Budiak: macked
    Budiak: heh maced
    Budiak: I wish

    ShmrckPmp5: a good thing people can't fire guns through the computer...your ass would have been shot years ago

    Y2A 47: youre smooth as hell
    Y2A 47: thats why you get outta tickets, and into panties

    galileo: you're a fucking beast and I hate you
    galileo: hate

    assgrabbers are never subtile, they will grabb ass whereever they go,public or not, I know the type, because I am one. - Rock

  25. #25
    Senior Member Meat_Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,315
    Originally posted by PowerManDL
    Two things:

    1) No matter what you might think, Westside produces the best benchers (well, Metal Militia...but I'm talking on the whole) in the world. Not only that, but they do it consistently. That should say something about their methods.

    2) Westside is designed for competitive powerlifters. Competitive is the key word, as it means they will be using equipment. "Weak" pectorals would only be apparent right off the chest in a PL bench style. If you're using a shirt, you won't even notice. Strong lats, however, will make quite a difference.
    So weaker pecs would be a very big problem in westside if one wasn't using a bench shirt....

    Most people in the gym don't use a bench shirt. Most don't compete. Most shouldn't neglect pectoral training.

    Also, when I'm talking about developing pectoral strength, I'm not really talking about crossovers or flies or any other pumping exercises. I'm talking about incline, flat, and decline bench pressing with barbells or dumbells, and dips. Those seem to be the most result producing exercises.

    The thing that annoys me is that people trying to improve their bench non-competitively start with westside and hardly to any full ROM bench work. There's routine after routine with the closest thing to actual benching being 2 board presses.

    I agree that with a bench shirt there isn't really much a need for bottom position pectoral strength because the shirt and lats help take care of it. But if you aren't going to be using a shirt, why not do some kind of full ROM barbell or dumbell touching the chest bench press. Seems more beneficial to me, since that is the movement you're training for.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •