The Five Biggest Contradictions in Fitness
Latest Article

The Five Biggest Contradictions in Fitness

Itís no secret that when people contradict themselves, it has the effect of making the flaws in their actions or statements seem glaringly obvious. But what about when WE ourselves get caught contradicting ourselves by someone else?

By: Nick Tumminello Added: January 6th, 2014
More Recent Articles
Contrast Training for Size
By: Lee Boyce
An Interview with Marianne Kane of Girls Gone Strong
By: Jordan Syatt
What Supplements Should I be Taking? By: Jay Wainwright
Bench Like a Girl By: Julia Ladewski
Some Thoughts on Building a Big Pull By: Christopher Mason

Facebook Join Facebook Group       Twitter Follow on Twitter       rss Subscribe via RSS
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Wannabebig Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    77

    double or single progression?

    Hi, I wanted to know what were everyones thoughts as to how to progress in weights. Is it better to use single progression, set number of reps, and then add weight. Or to use double progression, ex. rep range of 4-8 and then add weight when top number of reps is reached.

  2.    Support Wannabebig and use AtLarge Nutrition Supplements!


  3. #2
    As I Am Paul Stagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    8,668
    Depends. They both work.

    For stuff where the progression jumps are too big (dumbell curls, for example), then double progression is certianly the way to go.

    Otherwise, try them both.
    Squats work better than supplements.
    "You know, if I thought like that, I'd never put more than one plate on the bar for anything, I'd never use bands or chains, I'd never squat to parallel or below, and I'd never let out the slightest grunt when I lift. At some point in your lifting career (assuming you're planning on getting reasonably strong and big), you're going to have to accept that most people think you are some kind of freak." -Sensei
    "You're wrong, and I have a completely irrelevant pubmed abstract that may or may not say so." - Belial
    I has a blog.
    I has a facebook.

  4. #3
    Senior Member shootermcgavin7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,240
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Stagg
    Depends. They both work.

    For stuff where the progression jumps are too big (dumbell curls, for example), then double progression is certianly the way to go.

    Otherwise, try them both.

    This is a great reply. Everyone is different, but you're right, they both work.

    Successful BBuilders will use them both. When I'm bulking I tend to try to bump the weight up each week (as I'm usually eating enough to manage it).

    When maintaining (or especially when cutting) I try to increase reps (most sets from 6-10, although you have to include the magic phrase "it depends")

    Although again, do what works best for you. The "one size fits all" mechanism sure as hell doesn't hold water for BBuilding.

  5. #4
    Wannabebig Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    0
    I like some of Ditillo's recommendations regarding progression.

    When training heavy low reps it makes sense to me to employ single progresssion using sets. i.e. start with 3sets of 3 and work up to 7 sets of three, then bump weight. This seems like a really sensible way to increase weight w/o as much injury risk.

    For higher rep work, it seems a lot easier to go with single progression using reps for obvious reasons.

    In general, it seems to me using double or even triple progression frequently could more quickly lead to overtraining. I would tend to use this at times when my diet and recovery were really dialed in.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •