Hey guys I have a question. The way I'm doing my working sets now is:
Set #1: A lighter weight that I can do about 8 reps with.
Set #2: Up the weight a bit so I can do maybe about 6 reps.
Set #3: Up the weight even more so I can do about 4 reps.
Set #4: Same as first set.
But I was thinking about maybe switching my first and last sets (the lighter sets) to even lighter sets and do speed sets. What do you guys think...speed and heavy in same session?
I'm confused, what does this have to do with speed sets?
never mind...believe it or not, I posted that on the wrong board!!! I have several tabs open in my browser and I chose the wrong one. My Bad! (i deleted my original post)
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Are you eating while you are reading this? You should be... --hrdgain81
Remember, kids, if you type well the Grammar Fairy will leave a quarter under your pillow. The Blue Book of Grammar and Punctuation
Well, the Blog's (finally) back (again!): Love and Hope and Sex and Dreams Feel free to stop by and comment.
Here is my newly-created World of Warcraft Blog: BG's WoW Blog. Once again, feel free to stop by and comment.
There's probably nothing wrong with that, but why are you thinking you need them?
instead of worrying about every little detail worry about the basics and use them
somewhat what I eat...
I guess I'm trying to develop speed (in relation to MA) and power.
But I had a talk with Crip earlier today and he told me to just keep my current routine and not worry about this stuff like you guys seem to also be suggesting. Thanks.
Like ryu said. Keep it simple, and always strive for more. Don't get drunk with the minutae.
for the sake of people in the future....
What is the proper process to follow for speedsets?
Out of the night that covers me,Black as the Pit from pole to pole,I thank whatever gods may be for my unconquerable soul. In The fell clutch of circumstance I have not winced nor cried aloud. Under the bludgeonings of chance my head is bloody, but unbowed. Beyond this place of wrath and tears looms but the horror of the shade And yet the menace of the years finds, and shall find, me unafraid. It matters not how strait the gate how charged with punishments the scroll,I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul.
Twitter: @joshuagbsn Follow me as I laugh at the world, and you.
Fix: you don't need speed sets at this point. Keep it simple!!
Hatred: this is just general, but bench tends to be 8 sets of 3 reps and squats are 8 sets of 2 reps. Deads are usually resets. Short rest between sets. Weight varies from 50-75% of 1RM. Some keep the weight consistent throughout the training cycle, others wave it.
Facebook - BW166 SQ585 BP405 DL660 CL310
For speed sets I even go as low as ~40% for bench and dead, 50%for squat.
Best Meet @ Lifts@181:...............Best gym lifts
Squat...- 403..........................Squat....- 395 w/belt
Bench...- 303..........................Bench....- 300....Paused in meet - 281
Deadlift.- 503.....Unofficial 513...Deadlift..- 490
Total....- 1,203...IPF Class II......All done raw, Touch'n go bench
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly" Robert F. Kennedy
"A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he gives up"
"However beautiful the strategy you should occasionally look at the results" John Berardi
Powerlifting Westside Style
Is there any point to training speed deads versus olympic lift variations? Isn't a speed dead already an olympic lift variation?Originally Posted by Anthony
I think people use too similar loading factors between dyanmic bench and squats, given the relatively low bar weights, without taking into consideration that they're also moving bodyweight in squats only.
A lot of people would agree w. you on this. I don't think that Dietrich Buchenholz is the guru that many do, but he does talk about this at length in his writings and his book. I don't know if you've read this, but take a look (the "Power Percentages" section in particular) and tell me what you think: http://inno-sport.net/The%20Buchenho...Volume%201.htmOriginally Posted by MixmasterNash
Interesting. Will have to read more, but it just makes a lot of sense to me.
"Appropriated Weight" seems to be the particular term I was looking for; in squats, this is to say that you should include about 85% of BW in the load.
Allow me to do math out loud:
So for me, I should include (170 *.85) = 145lbs with my squat 1RM of 300, for an AW max of 450-ish. So, a 50% load is actually 225, and subtracting 145, I get 80lbs. In the standard calculation, I would instead use 50% of 300, 150lb and so the indicated loading parameters are radically different!
A more interesting case is a body movement exercise with a lower added weight component, such as pullups. My 1RM is +115 or so. I figure the BW factor is about .90 or maybe slightly higher. So... 115 + (.90 * 170) = 268 AW 1RM. So, a 50% load is 134, and subtracting the BW component we get -19!
Whee! Time to break out the jump stretch bands for 50% dynamic work in pullups.
This is obviously experientially true, as there is no way that (+115 * .5) = +57.5 pullup will be very dynamic at all. But I like the proper mathematical underpinnings.
On the moon, nerds have their pants pulled down and they are spanked with moon rocks.Originally Posted by MixmasterNash
I hung out with a gaggle of 18 year old incoming freshman babes today, so there. Ha. CTOPS rules.Originally Posted by DenimDemon
By which I mean I watched like a lecherous old man as they walked by.
I think you're a little off on your calcs - i cant type easily (baby in arm), but i'll reply later...
edit: thats the basic idea though
edit 2: nevermind - you're dead on!
Last edited by Sensei; 07-18-2005 at 04:42 PM.
**** man, I've been doing that SINCE CTOPS. **** I miss college.Originally Posted by MixmasterNash