what is wrong with this split?
m CHEST BIES
T BACK SHOULDERS TRICEPS
tCHEST Bies LEGS
fBACK SHOULDERS TRICEPS
Last edited by dasher; 11-01-2005 at 04:29 AM. Reason: spelling
Nothing really i would maybe put a rest day in on friday and move everything up1. However as stated before a split is one this however a full workout is another. Just because the split is ok doesnt mean your workouts will be and we cant tell you this without seeing details. Also why every body part twice a week but legs once. and i dont see any abs
weight 202 - (bf around 14%)
Bench - 286
deadlift - new pr on the 23/12/06 190 kilo (430 pound)
squat - 264 ATF
200 pound at 10% bf by next summer
why not just do an upper/lower split?
once your upper body grows beyond your lower body you will feel disproportionate and awkward
usually if you do a spilt where you work everything twice, you work everything twice? I do a similar spilt, but I work legs twice, I like it that way breaks up hams and quads... contrary to belief women do look at mens legs . I also don't do 2 days of direct arms. I think that is a bit much as they get worked on chest and back day...
Also on a side note I personally prefer to work out arms not on chest or back day because my arms aren't tired after doing the compounds so I am stronger...
Live Love Laugh and LIFT
BO Row: 115X6
The problem is that you train everything twice except the most important muscles in your body.
Facebook - BW166 SQ585 BP405 DL660 CL310
...somewhere off in a dark corner, there is a beefy pair of tree-trunk style legs weeping at this workout.
32 yo - 5'6" - 170 lbs
USAPL Meet PRs (Raw @154 lbs): 347 SQ, 242 BP, 507 DL, 1096 TOTAL
Gym PRs: 370 SQ, 270 BP, 510 DL
The Riddle Of Iron - Kiaran's Garage Training Log
I agree that an upper/lower split would be more effective. Otherwise, you could try chest/delts/triceps day 1, legs/back/biceps day 2, rest, repeat, or push/pull - but why only legs once per week?