Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Westside dynamic training

  1. #1
    Bigger fewl
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Ft. Worth, Texas
    Posts
    629

    Westside dynamic training

    Honestly, I don't see a point to this. I do my dynamic sets with bout 70+% of my max, and I go to a rep below failure. That really works, but is there a point in using 60% and less for only 2 or 3 reps? Do you westsiders think this has done anything for your strength? Gimme your thoughts....
    Squat...Eat...Sleep...Grow!

    Carpe diem

    Milk.... it does the body good.

  2. #2
    Moderator Adam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    5,720
    It made me lift way more explosively while practicing my form more. Right now im only using about 50% of my max for it too
    Best Meet @ Lifts@181:...............Best gym lifts
    Squat...- 403..........................Squat....- 395 w/belt
    Bench...- 303..........................Bench....- 300....Paused in meet - 281
    Deadlift.- 503.....Unofficial 513...Deadlift..- 490
    Total....- 1,203...IPF Class II......All done raw, Touch'n go bench

    "Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly" Robert F. Kennedy

    "A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he gives up"

    "However beautiful the strategy you should occasionally look at the results" John Berardi

    Powerlifting Westside Style

  3. #3
    Proud Father Maki Riddington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.
    Posts
    5,323
    Correct me if I'm off but I would think that it has to do with the corelation between intra and inter muscular coordination.

    Take two people and get them to train on being more efficient on a lift by getting one to move a heavy load explosively and get the other to use a lighter load.
    Who do you think would have better intra and inter muscular coordination?
    Maki Fit Blog

    At Large: Optimize Your Body | Dynamic Conditioning |
    My articles on Wannabebig

    "Soli Deo Gloria"
    "Test all things; hold fast what is good.": 1 Thessalonians 5:21

    "I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do--this I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.
    So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God--through Jesus Christ our Lord!"
    Romans 7:14-25

    "Judo is not about strength. Yet in the learning curve, all Judokas get strong. Only with time do you learn where to apply that strength."
    The Art of Judo

  4. #4
    Bigger fewl
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Ft. Worth, Texas
    Posts
    629
    Just a thought.... I've never seen anyone do a MAXIMAL powerlift really explosively.
    Last edited by DaChickenShowYo; 02-02-2002 at 05:39 PM.
    Squat...Eat...Sleep...Grow!

    Carpe diem

    Milk.... it does the body good.

  5. #5
    Proud Father Maki Riddington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.
    Posts
    5,323
    Correct, but I'm referring to the attempt (sp) to explosively move a weight regardless if the actually movement is slow/ fast in nature.
    Maki Fit Blog

    At Large: Optimize Your Body | Dynamic Conditioning |
    My articles on Wannabebig

    "Soli Deo Gloria"
    "Test all things; hold fast what is good.": 1 Thessalonians 5:21

    "I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do--this I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.
    So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God--through Jesus Christ our Lord!"
    Romans 7:14-25

    "Judo is not about strength. Yet in the learning curve, all Judokas get strong. Only with time do you learn where to apply that strength."
    The Art of Judo

  6. #6
    Administrator chris mason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    12,698
    Good thought Dachicken. Training with light resistance in order to be able to really throw the weight in an explosive fashion is not the best way to train for increased overall strength (in my opinion). You can develop increased power with one of two methods. You can train explosively with lighter resistance, or you can increase your strength. Power equals force (or strength) x distance/time. So, if you can lift a given resistance quicker, you have increased your power. The idea behind light training in an explosive fashion is that you will increase your ability to generate quick, explosive muscular contractions. I don't think this idea is inaccurate, but I submit to you that it is not the best method to increase your power. I believe that heavy training at a high percentage of your 1RM is best for developing power. Heavy resistance training harnesses your largest motor units, and more overall motor units. It also places a greater impetus on the nervous system to develop quick, powerful contractions of the musculature (if you are going to be able to move the ponderous poundage you are attempting). Training with a lighter resistance may help to increase your ability to generate quick contractions, but they will be relatively weak , quick contractions. In other words, you are training your nervous system to generate quick contractions, but againt a non-challenging resistance. This argument applies to training which is geared towards increased maximum strength only.

  7. #7
    Proud Father Maki Riddington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.
    Posts
    5,323
    If the individual were to periodize ( whatever form that it may be ) these two methods then there would be a greater overall result. Anyways I don't think that using light loads by themselves is what West Side uses.
    Maki Fit Blog

    At Large: Optimize Your Body | Dynamic Conditioning |
    My articles on Wannabebig

    "Soli Deo Gloria"
    "Test all things; hold fast what is good.": 1 Thessalonians 5:21

    "I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do--this I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.
    So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. For in my inner being I delight in God's law; but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God--through Jesus Christ our Lord!"
    Romans 7:14-25

    "Judo is not about strength. Yet in the learning curve, all Judokas get strong. Only with time do you learn where to apply that strength."
    The Art of Judo

  8. #8
    Bigger fewl
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Ft. Worth, Texas
    Posts
    629
    That was my thinking. Also, why not build up your 'speed'(power) with heavy weights? Olympic maximal lifts are very fast and explosive, by I've never heard of a speed clean and press with low percentages of max

    Of course these are different types of lifting, but I don't see how a dynamic rep with 60% of your max and only a few reps would stimulate better neural efficiency than a dynamic rep with 70+% and reps nearly to failure.
    Last edited by DaChickenShowYo; 02-02-2002 at 06:27 PM.
    Squat...Eat...Sleep...Grow!

    Carpe diem

    Milk.... it does the body good.

  9. #9
    Moderator Adam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    5,720
    Chris, do you understand westside training cause you pretty much wrote down what they do. One day is devoted to the comp lifts done for speed. Reason behind this is that it helps to be explosive and it lets your get your form down. The other day is the maximal effort day where you pick an excercise like the compitition one and max out on it. The perpose to this is to be able to generate a very large force for a prolonged period of time.

    Chicken, the reason the weight is so low and you can still get more explosive is because you have to push it as hard as you can to be effective. Say you were using 150lbs. You would have to try to push it with 250lbs force in order to make it go as fast as possible.
    Best Meet @ Lifts@181:...............Best gym lifts
    Squat...- 403..........................Squat....- 395 w/belt
    Bench...- 303..........................Bench....- 300....Paused in meet - 281
    Deadlift.- 503.....Unofficial 513...Deadlift..- 490
    Total....- 1,203...IPF Class II......All done raw, Touch'n go bench

    "Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly" Robert F. Kennedy

    "A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he gives up"

    "However beautiful the strategy you should occasionally look at the results" John Berardi

    Powerlifting Westside Style

  10. #10
    Lord Kel Masters Sayiajin Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    EXIT^2, Ny
    Posts
    1,823
    Originally posted by Maki Riddington
    If the individual were to periodize ( whatever form that it may be ) these two methods then there would be a greater overall result.
    i second that on personal experience

    i wanna bench 400 some day, then speed bench 200
    ill be mad quick
    "The whole jedi thing was just not compatible with my lifestyle. My master was jelous he was always holding me back, -"be mindfull of the future, but live in the present"- what the hell does that mean? I even got my arm cut off...it just sucked. So i switched to the dark side and i havent looked back once...Now i am shooting lightning from my fingertips, choking people over the phone, i even get to wear a cape.....its just boss. My name is Anikin skywalker and i am a sith lord."

    "i have the sex drive of 10 rabbits on viagra"

    age: 19
    height: 5'8'' (im lieing its probably 5'7'')
    weight: 159-165 lbs (morning and day)
    bodyfat: 8.6
    bench:315
    squat:405
    Deadlift:500

    goals for end of the year 405/500/600 at 170-175(with the 8pack)

    other: dips 3 and a quarter plates for 4 reps

  11. #11
    Player Hater PowerManDL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    7,850
    It does work. I'll attest to that personally--

    However, I do see why you'd question its efficacy.

    Truth be told, I tend to lean towards the higher end of the percentage spectrum. It seems to work better for me to use 60-65% than to use anything lighter.

    And yes, from 50-65% actually does have a measurable and in fact quite pronounced effect on both power generation and muscular explosiveness (or rate of force development). As noted, however, training in this fashion alone won't develop top-end strength.

    That's the whole reason that Westside uses conjugated training; the speed days are secondary to the maximal days, and only work enhance its effects. There's a very good reason the maximal workout takes place ~72 hours after the dynamic.

    No, you won't find any maximal powerlifts performed explosively. At least not from the standpoint of the power developed. However, explosiveness also refers to rate of force development, starting strength, muscular explosiveness, whatever you want to call it-- its essentially how much force you can develop, by recruiting motor units, before the load is actually moved. This is what the dynamic days are designed to train, and they do a good job of it.

    Olympic lifting doesn't have to be done at lower percentages for technique reasons and because the percentage is technically already low. If you can deadlift 400 and power clean 225, you're using a smaller percentage of your "pull." The analogy isn't really appropriate when the topic is powerlifting.

    Finally, the dynamic effort method isn't the only way to achieve this. The static-dynamic method has been proving itself to be highly effective in my workouts. Use a load of 65-85% of your 1RM for 2-4 reps with a 3 second hold at the bottom followed by an explosive concentric. The effect, neurologically speaking, is roughly the same, and the pause has a direct carryover to powerlifting. In my thinking, its more specific to generate force from an isometric contraction than to generate force by reversing a ballistic action, where alot of the tension is going to come from the stretch-shortening reflex.

    All being said, both methods have provided consistent results when applied, and both will continue to be used in my routines.
    Vin Diesel has a fever.. and the only prescription is more cowbell.

    Budiak: That girl I maced
    Budiak: macked
    Budiak: heh maced
    Budiak: I wish

    ShmrckPmp5: a good thing people can't fire guns through the computer...your ass would have been shot years ago

    Y2A 47: youre smooth as hell
    Y2A 47: thats why you get outta tickets, and into panties

    galileo: you're a fucking beast and I hate you
    galileo: hate

    assgrabbers are never subtile, they will grabb ass whereever they go,public or not, I know the type, because I am one. - Rock

  12. #12
    Administrator chris mason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    12,698
    No, I have never studied Westside Training, but I have seen quite a bit about it on this site.


    Let's look at this argument this way, break the training down individually. For example, let us say a trainee can bench press 200 lbs for a 1RM. This trainee decides to use 120 lbs for sets of 10 reps in an explosive fashion (not to failure). After 3 weeks this trainee attempts 200 lbs again. Much to the trainee's surprise, he cannot manage 1 rep, he can handle the 120 lbs with ease, but he has actually lowered his 1RM. Now, the same trainee then decides to train using 170 lbs for sets of 4, stopping 1 rep short of failure. After 3 weeks he attempts 200 lbs again and much to his surprise, he can get 2 reps with 200 lbs.

    The above hypothetical scenario is very accurate as to what would happen in real life. Training with light weights (relatively), no matter what form is used, will do nothing for increasing maximum strength. Of course, Westside obviously combines the 2 styles of training. In theory, I suppose their thoughts are that the 2 styles are synergistic. In my opinion, that is not the case, at least not in the sense in that the light training will make one more "explosive" with heavier resistances. I think they may have come to their conclusion based on the fact that this cycling of training allows for recovery between maximal, heavy sessions, nothing more. Powerman believes as Westside does, and I can respect their opinions, but I think they are incorrect. Now, please note that I am making my argument against this style of training for the development of maximum demonstrable strength (or 1RM), nothing else.

  13. #13
    As I Am Paul Stagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    8,668
    Remember, too, that when you read about Westside training, the maximums are normally with equipment.

    Thos of us who lift without equipment tend to do our DE work with a little higher percentage.
    Squats work better than supplements.
    "You know, if I thought like that, I'd never put more than one plate on the bar for anything, I'd never use bands or chains, I'd never squat to parallel or below, and I'd never let out the slightest grunt when I lift. At some point in your lifting career (assuming you're planning on getting reasonably strong and big), you're going to have to accept that most people think you are some kind of freak." -Sensei
    "You're wrong, and I have a completely irrelevant pubmed abstract that may or may not say so." - Belial
    I has a blog.
    I has a facebook.

  14. #14
    Player Hater PowerManDL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    7,850
    Originally posted by chris mason

    Let's look at this argument this way, break the training down individually. For example, let us say a trainee can bench press 200 lbs for a 1RM. This trainee decides to use 120 lbs for sets of 10 reps in an explosive fashion (not to failure). After 3 weeks this trainee attempts 200 lbs again. Much to the trainee's surprise, he cannot manage 1 rep, he can handle the 120 lbs with ease, but he has actually lowered his 1RM. Now, the same trainee then decides to train using 170 lbs for sets of 4, stopping 1 rep short of failure. After 3 weeks he attempts 200 lbs again and much to his surprise, he can get 2 reps with 200 lbs.
    That's the case, yes. But no (halfway intelligent) advocate of light weight ballistic training is going to prescribe sets of 10 for explosiveness training. I do see your point, however, and I did some digging through Supertraining to support this one way or another. I found some pretty interesting stuff.

    Turns out that starting strength at a high % of your 1RM is best enhanced by using heavier relative loads. And that, as I'd previously surmised, developing explosive-isometric tension also aids starting strength tremendously.

    However, in defense of dynamic effort training, it does appear to reduce the strength deficit between the force the muscle is capable of generating, and the force it can generate through voluntary effort. Additionally, it aids in acceleration strength, which is the ability to keep accelerating a load after its begun moving.

    For those reasons, I feel that dynamic-method training still has a place, even though you're correct that it won't directly improve the 1RM.
    Vin Diesel has a fever.. and the only prescription is more cowbell.

    Budiak: That girl I maced
    Budiak: macked
    Budiak: heh maced
    Budiak: I wish

    ShmrckPmp5: a good thing people can't fire guns through the computer...your ass would have been shot years ago

    Y2A 47: youre smooth as hell
    Y2A 47: thats why you get outta tickets, and into panties

    galileo: you're a fucking beast and I hate you
    galileo: hate

    assgrabbers are never subtile, they will grabb ass whereever they go,public or not, I know the type, because I am one. - Rock

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •