Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: smith machine good enougth for squats??

  1. #1
    Wannabebig Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    0

    smith machine good enougth for squats??

    there is no squat machines in my local gym, just smith machines...I just want to know if the smith machine is good enougth or should I get back to leg presses and lunges?

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Senior Member Anthony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    12,020
    Leg Press is arguable just as bad as a smith machine.

    Built's suggestions are good. You can also try zercher squats, overhead squats, and pistols.
    Facebook - BW166 SQ585 BP405 DL660 CL310

  4. #4
    Senior Member Sensei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    7,644
    Quote Originally Posted by coconut
    there is no squat machines in my local gym, just smith machines...I just want to know if the smith machine is good enougth or should I get back to leg presses and lunges?
    A squat machine and a smith machine are equally worthless IMnevertobeHO.

    Start squatting with a barbell.
    A child does not learn to squat from the top down. In other words, he does not suddenly make a conscious decision one day to squat. Actually, he is squatting one day and make the conscious decision to stand. Squatting precedes standing in the developmental sequence. This is the way a child's brain learns to use the body as the child develops movement patterns. Therefore, a child is probably crawling, rocks back into a squatting position with the back completely relaxed and the hips completely flexed, and stands when he has enough hip strength. This approach makes a lot of sense and can be applied to relearning the deep squat movement if it is lost. -Gray Cook
    Lifting Clips: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=johnnymnemonic2
    Blog: http://squatrx.blogspot.com/

  5. #5
    Amateur Strongman Dinosaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    433
    I wouldn't make my own worst enemy do squats in a Smith machine. It's biomechanically incorrect and bad for you.

  6. #6
    Former Fatass Unreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    SLC,UT
    Posts
    3,084
    Machine? If you have a barbell and a rack then you have all you need. If you don't have a rack, then you can still do front, hack, and many others like all the wonderful people above pointed out.
    Nick V

  7. #7
    Take Two Ruffian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    DisneyWorld
    Posts
    743
    Boo on the smith machine. Does you no good!
    Stats:
    Age: 22
    Height: 5' 5.5"
    Weight: 180 lbs
    Max lifts: Squat:320 lbs, Bench: 195 lbs, Deadlift: 290 lbs.
    Max Comp. Total: 805 lbs

    Picture Links
    Most Recent Pix, August 2006, Febuary 2006, Starting Pictures (2005)
    MY JOURNAL

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Western Canada
    Posts
    0
    I'm a big fan of regular barbell squats, I wouldn't call smith machine squats useless.
    Every workout is a new battle
    and I always win

  9. #9
    Senior Member McVein's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    2,159
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruffian
    Boo on the smith machine. Does you no good!
    ....no good???

    i have the same lack of rack problem...

    i just do higher reps, lower weight....whatever i can clean up there...i squat....which isnt too much, but i do have well developed legs....
    Quote Originally Posted by Everyone View Post
    I agree with McVein

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •