I'm going to be taking a week off from lifting, and want to change my routine around (slightly) when I come back.
I've been doing this:
These are the 2 splits I've come up with, and I'm just trying to pick one.
I realize either one is perfectly fine, I just need to pick one. Any thoughts?
I don't like any of them.
I'd much rather see you go with an upper/lower/upper/lower split (if you are absolutely regulated to m-t-t-f) or better yet, a full body routine 3x a week and maybe 1-2 days of conditioning/skill/sport work.
Really? Have you tried Anthony's suggestion for any period of time? How long have you been training? What are your goals?
Squats work better than supplements.
"You know, if I thought like that, I'd never put more than one plate on the bar for anything, I'd never use bands or chains, I'd never squat to parallel or below, and I'd never let out the slightest grunt when I lift. At some point in your lifting career (assuming you're planning on getting reasonably strong and big), you're going to have to accept that most people think you are some kind of freak." -Sensei
"You're wrong, and I have a completely irrelevant pubmed abstract that may or may not say so." - Belial
I has a blog.
I has a facebook.
Because any routine that is divided by muscle groups makes about as much sense as a routine divided by tan lines. Your body works as a unit - train it like one. Start thinking about movements instead of muscle groups.
And it has been scientifically proven that higher frequency benefits strength and size.
I spent most of the beginning (a year or 2) with an each muscle twice a week split. It was when I switched to a once a week split soon after that I actually felt like I was getting good results.
I started at 120lbs (5'10.5). I'm 170lbs now doing a slow cut probably down to about 160ish.
I'd like to be a lean 180lbs.
From what I've seen, BGB covers most of the important movements with good frequency.
No, bgb hits different muscle groups a few times a week by using compound exercises.
You have a whole day dedicated to shoulders and abs... why? The shoulder is one of the smallest muscle groups, and abs can be done whenever.
Day 1 Horizontal push pull
Day 2 Quad dominant
Day 3 Vertical push pull
Day 4 Hamstring dominant
A quick skim of that looks like each muscle is hit once a week... unless I'm missing something else?
Yeah you would be hitting the smaller muscle groups 1+/wk but the larger only once.
Current Stats --------------- Training Goals: Improve athletic conditioning.
Squat - 305lbs - 1/23/06 ----- 335
Deadlift - 415lbs - 2/4/06 ---- 435
Bench - 90s*7 ----------------- 100s*5
Weight - 208 ------------------ 190
Height - 5'10"
My Journal|My Routine|My FitDay
WBBB|"Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up" - Thomas Edison
Tuesday: legs (quads, hams, calves)
With maybe calves again on Friday. Then bis, tris and calves would get hit twice during the week, with back, chest, legs and shoulders getting hit once? (Actually, shoulders get some indirect work on chest day, so they get hit twice as well)
Last edited by unstop; 12-13-2006 at 12:00 PM.
The same things that were wrong the first time you posted it.
We don't know the movements you plan to use.
Your frequency is low.
You said you don't like the splits I mentioned above because the frequency is low, but you like BGB and said it's a good frequency. I've been reading all about BGB over the last hour or so, and the above splits I mentioned don't seem THAT far off.
For example, horizontal back, vertical back, chest and vertical shoulders are all hit just once per week on BGB. Unless I'm wayyyy dumber than I think I am, isn't the same true for the splits I just mentioned in my previous post?
(And about movements, bench press, squats, overhead press, SLDL, pull ups, barbell rows, cable rows, barbell/dumbell curls, skull crushers, press downs, lateral raises, etc.)
Last edited by unstop; 12-13-2006 at 12:21 PM.
Yeah, you're comparing apples and oranges.
Horizontal pull on one day and Vertical pull on another day use different MOVEMENTS but the same MUSCLES. So the same muscles get hit at least twice a week.
Your routines are divided by muscles, so they get hit once a week. There is some overlap between exercises like you mentioned, but it's for the small stuff like biceps. You have low frequency for all the important stuff.
Ok, I'm getting closer to understanding. A few more questions...
For legs, it's a full quad workout once a week, a full ham workout once a week, and then a lesser version of each (BGB shows leg extensions for quads, leg curls for hams) one other time during the week. So they get hit twice, but too a much lesser and lighter extent the second time. Is that correct?
And chest appears to only get hit (directly or indirectly) just once really. Is that correct?
Biceps and triceps are getting hit one way or another 3 times per week. Correct?
Shoulders once directly, once indirectly with chest, so twice total. Correct?
If this is all correct, would you agree that a routine that consists of sort of variation of BGB where, for the most part, each muscle gets hit the same amount of times as BGB hits them, would be good?
I'm not an expert on BGB, I think its design is a little more complicated than necessary and it excludes a couple of pieces I feel are important.
However, my understanding from looking at it is that everything gets hit at least twice. There were discussions about chest, and that's easily resolved (add dips in some where or whatever).
Bottom line, essentially it's an upper/lower/upper/lower split. They work because they increase your frequency (scientifically proven to work), and because of time constraints, they force you to focus on big compound movements.
Anthony, get off your lazy ass, climb up the table with your midget ladder, and write up some decent "official" splits!
Hahah, YOU do it and I'll get Daniel to post them!