Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: on the bench

  1. #1
    no matter what SaVvY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    743

    on the bench

    i just got back from doing this:

    decline bench
    - 100kg x 5
    - 110kg x 1

    this is the 1st time ive ever done decline, it was very strange, the bar was all over the show an i still found the weights easy, i hardly took a rest for the 110 an i still could have done reps - on flat i failed to move 100kg more than a few inches not so long ago

    Is it normal to be this much stronger on decline? im thinking it may be that on flat my delts take over due to all the overhead work ive done, but with this im using more chest..??

    Thanks for any replies

  2. #2
    Big #Five-Nine
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    0
    yes...i have done 315x2 on bench, but can knock it out 4-6 times on decline. I dont know why it is that way, but it is...

  3. #3
    no matter what SaVvY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    743
    im pretty sure your decline is always higher cuss of the smaller ROM, i just didnt think it was usually by this much? i mean, i did 90kg 3 x 5 on close grip, then went straight over an did 50kg x 8 30 secs later, then 30 secs later did 80kg x 2, then a minute later did 100kg x 5, then 30 secs later did 110kg x 1

    i think its very possible that i could do 100kg x 8 on decline, an ive never done that much on flat period

  4. #4
    Always Learning IZich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    768
    thats normal sav. try out the 100kgx8 and let us know what happens.
    6'2" | 215 lbs

    B320 S315 D440 = 1075
    The Road to 1200
    I'm always open to suggestions and critique, so stop by and help a brother out!

    "Determination is the wake-up call to the human will." - TR

  5. #5
    no matter what SaVvY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by IZich View Post
    thats normal sav. try out the 100kgx8 and let us know what happens.
    oh..didnt realise - will do

  6. #6
    Big #Five-Nine
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    0
    same thing with incline...my incline is a lot less then my normal bench...but i think its because i just havnt been doing it much. Well...i am working hard on it now.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    12,251
    yeah, decline you can do more because the ROM is shorter, flat i can do 315 for 2 or 3 but decline ive done 2 sets of 5 no problem, could of did 8-10 the first set.

    i like decline, good for a change and good for the arching bencher.
    2000 or bust

  8. #8
    Senior Member JHarris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    256
    Its my understanding that there are 2 big reasons for decline tending to be bigger than flat bench. The first, as many have pointed out, is the shorter range of motion. The second is that more emphasis is put on the triceps and less is put on the shoulders. The tricep has much better leverage than the shoulders do in this position.

    If you go to a powerlifting competition, you will see people arching their backs very hard. This puts them in a position to decline bench the bar allowing for a shorter, straighter distance for the bar to travel as well as greater tricep recruitment in the lift.

    Jay

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brighton, Illinois
    Posts
    730
    Decline isn't really useful. In my and Unholy's Opinion.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    University at Albany
    Posts
    2,513
    I agree. The decline is just a nice change up from the normal bench training. It does not teach you to arch or press more on the bench.

  11. #11
    Team Chesticles! Unholy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,880
    I just don't find a need for it. Flat/Incline + switching between BB and DB has worked great for me though.
    5'11" 185lbs 9% BF
    S/D/B PR's 445x1, 495x5, 335x1......Looking to get stronger and do a PL Meet this summer!
    Chronological Picture Thread 2005-Current
    Pro Status or Bust..2011

    At Large Nutrition, Optimize YOUR body!

  12. #12
    Senior Member HeavyBomber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Granger Indiana, USA
    Posts
    2,164
    Quote Originally Posted by WarriorWalls View Post
    Decline isn't really useful. In my and Unholy's Opinion.
    Yes they are IMO.

Similar Threads

  1. The Bench Press
    By Adam in forum Bodybuilding & Weight Training
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-17-2007, 11:46 AM
  2. Bench Press and Tricep Training
    By Keith Wassung in forum Bodybuilding & Weight Training
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-04-2005, 11:05 PM
  3. Barbell Bench vs. Hammer Strength
    By Eph610Power in forum Bodybuilding & Weight Training
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-02-2005, 06:35 AM
  4. looks like a waste of time liftin for me
    By ITHURTZ in forum Members' Pics and Videos
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 10-23-2003, 08:25 AM
  5. Why is a BB bench a compound exercise but DB bench aint?
    By Behemoth in forum Bodybuilding & Weight Training
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-04-2003, 09:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •