Has anyone ever figured this out and which is actually cheaper? I've been using homemade ones from that shake recipe thread and they definitely do become expensive. Milk, Natty PB, Olive Oil, Whey, etc. I'm starting think maybe brand name weightgainer products might be cheaper...or am I wrong? I'd think buying a big ass tub of weightgainer product(like the new Maximus by AtLarge) and put enough of it for 1000 calories in milk would be cheaper and easier. I'm a fixed income, so whatever is cheaper is essential for me. On the other hand, with a homemade one you know exactly what's in them.
What's the final say on this?
Last edited by wdjuqi; 05-17-2007 at 04:00 PM.
It's cheaper to make your own. Cytogainer, for example, costs almost $2 per serving for 570 calories and 54 grams protein. That price will, obviously, go up if you use milk and/or double the serving to hit 1000 calories.
Making your own involves purchasing a lot of things at once, but the actual cost per serving is cheaper.
And homemade shakes are healthier and you know exactly what's going in them.
"The only easy day was yesterday."
Wow, I guess I was wrong. I was thinking it HAD to be cheaper, but I guess not. I know from making them, when you add up what you spend on milk, olive oil, oats, whey protein, natty PB, etc. for the shakes....it's pretty damn expensive.
I wish there was a good, healthy AND cheap weightgainer....I don't think they'll ever be one though. I think AtLarge's prices are pretty expensive, so Maximus certainly won't be the solution either.
Last edited by wdjuqi; 05-19-2007 at 07:51 PM.
Get a better job?
"The only easy day was yesterday."
And really, there's no specific need for a "weight gainer"; it's just a convenient way to get more food down. Keeping Cytogainer as the example : 54 g protein, 80 grams carb. Two scoops of whey and 120 grams of oats and you're there. That's what, a buck?
Your example of Cytogainer holds true that 2 scoops of whey and oats can equal the protein/carb levels...but it's calories that are important. Two scoops of whey and oats are like 350 calories in one shake. I get well over 2,000 calories a day from my shakes, 350 just wouldn't cut it.
In terms of cost, the question would be: does your 2000 calories in homemade shakes cost more or less than four servings of something like Cytogainer.
In other words, you'd be wise to listen to RedSpikeyThing.
Personally, I wouldn't want to be getting 320 calories a day from maltodextrin, but that's just me.
edit: Doh. Make that "320grams of maltodextrin. 1280 calories."
Last edited by JustLost; 05-20-2007 at 09:50 AM. Reason: stupid mistake
You're right about the the scoops of whey and oats being 700 calories...I was thinking of something else. But that's a ****load of oats for one shake...120 grams is a cup and a half. Yuck.
Anyway, I guess it's settled then. Homemade shakes are cheaper and healthier than a "bought" weightgainer. I just wish the ingredients were cheaper, lol.
I think shakes are, by far, the easiest way to gain weight. No contest.
BTW, why is everyone excited about AtLarge's new weightgainer if homeade ones are cheaper and healthier for you?
Given the ingredient you list for a shake, I'd probably make oatmeal, throw some peanut butter in it and eat that, mix the whey in the milk and drink that, then use the olive oil in something else.
Oh, wait, that's what I do.
I would go for home made but the products are easy to make, just add and shake, faster that adding all the home made stuff and blending it.